...since your arrival here you have constantly brought up the " right side of history " justification ( obsessively imo )

So I was just wondering how you felt about being on the wrong side .

Eh, it's not so bad after all, I guess.

...get use to it

...it had to happen eventually and I'm a patient man

I'm operating under your classification that supporting a candidate that loses in a primary is being on the wrong side of history. If that's your definition, then I certainly fit it. I supported Bernie, and he lost.

...nope , you're just denying your own . You supported more than just a candidate , you backed an ideology .

So the next question should be once Hillary and trump are both nominated as the party leaders should they be able to receive classified information? It's usually a briefing that give a little bit of the landscape of what's going on in our country and around the world to the Future "President"

Trump - Never held public office and has made conspiracy posts via twitter before also never received any classified information

Clinton - Currently under fbi investigation for mishandling classified information and technically i do believe that her she might be banned from receiving information due to "didn't know" technique

anyhow what's your guys thoughts on this briefing that I think will be done by the current president or maybe chief of staff

"Mr Trump, please...do not...tweet...any of this"

"Mrs. Clinton, please...do not...email...any of this"

I think the idea of Trump knowing the secret stuff is pretty terrifying not as terrifying as knowing the secret stuff and having the power to react to it but still pretty bad

Thanks Republicans