don't you have some more TYT to parrot so you can pretend you understand American politics?

check out this one:
http://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2016/may/02/donald-trump/donald-trumps-claim-about-receiving-most-votes-eve/

How do they call that a "false" when they themselves put in the caveat that its going to be true? At worst its a half true. They could say he's gotten the most votes at this stage of a campaign, which may or may not be true, or that its just poorly worded.
When Trump says something that they can take to a strict literal interpretation as wrong, they call it "False"
but when Obama says something that was false;

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/apr/05/barack-obama/barack-obama-jumps-gun-us-uninsured-rate-then-reve/

suddenly its half-true because he's allowed to errata what he said! Funny how this ex-post facto stuff works when you have a bias.

And so by not releasing them to the public, Hillary deserves some criticism and questions for it. She doesn't have to release them. But the questions will still be there, and they have been brought up at many debates now. That's all I'm saying.

Ideally your president and leader is someone who you can trust and someone is transparent. Is Hillary Clinton those things? We will see how forth-coming she is about her scandals and these transcripts and etc.

So while there isn't a precedent for a candidate to release transcripts like this before, you also have to wonder why that may be. Has there ever been a presidential candidate/nominee that has been shrouded in more secrecy or scandals before? The only two presidential candidates in US history that underwent federal investigations during their campaigns are Hillary Clinton and Richard Nixon.

It's not difficult to understand, he was behind by a couple of hundred delegates after he got smashed in the south back when his name recognition was low. also you love TYT, don't know why you deny it, you were the first to mention the democracy spring protests!

good thing I don't drink because if i did every time you said this I would be dead

..I don't wonder a whit---my guess is that she said pretty much what you'd think she say....the question only remains because Sanders supporters have found the bone they can't let go of .

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-muslim-ban-just-a-suggestion-140024443.html

muslim ban off perhaps. flip flopping like everyone knew his snake ass would...

I mean the bigger bone to pick is the email and server scandal.

With Hillary Clinton, there are just so many scandals and secrets to pick from.

If people are tired of talking about the transcrips, there is plenty of other material to work with.

So your side failed to show quid pro quo/corruption on any real level but those transcripts have the secret to the downfall of Clinton?

Everything will come to a head and she will be exposed because she may have brown nosed a bit?

give me a break, hopefully she does release them at the right time to give a double dragon kick to Trumper supporters and bernie bros at the same time

Is it a flip flop if he never had intentions in the first place?