Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Oct 23 2023 05:32am)
Well maybe he shouldn't be a legal motorist if he thought any of this was a good idea. I didn't say he tried to run them down, I said he pushed through them. Not sure if you've ever tried driving a car through a group of people before but generally they do not react well. I said run them down in the Charlottesville example because that is how it would be framed in that situation.
And no they are not clearly the aggressors, the start of the incident begins with his car already moving through a crowd of people, chances are he was actually the aggressor in this situation.
They surrounded him, chased him and attacked him as he tried to get away.
Quote
WE have not seen this 500 times in the past, you may have but I doubt that based on how badly you've described every aspect of this so far.
Not rioters or a riot btw, you sound silly describing it this way, words matter goom :rofl:
They surrounded him, chased him and attacked him as he tried to get away. Hence, rioters. Because they are rioting. Engaging in a lawless riot. Which is why I'm calling them rioters. Comprende?
Quote
Could you be any more dishonest in your framing of this? At least make it a challenge to dunk on you
They surrounded him, chased him and attacked him as he tried to get away, hence me saying they surrounded him, chased him and attacked him as he tried to get away. As a riotous mob. Doing riotous mob things, as is quite usual for the area