I don't doubt that they can do that, however it honestly sounds to me like a legal way to take away an employee's freedom of speech.

Then don’t sign the contract

The employer has to protect themselves just as much as the employee

This post was edited by SharpNips on Nov 10 2022 10:17am

Or maybe the kinds of contracts some companies require one to sign are coercive in nature and as such, are unethical.

I really think people should have the freedom to express their political opinions without fear of losing their jobs.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Nov 10 2022 10:21am

absolutely nothing coercive about a voluntary contract, he chose to go there and had several other options.

What does the Kyrie thing have to do with politics?

This post was edited by SharpNips on Nov 10 2022 10:26am

Here, a contract where one is obligated to break the law is considered invalid. Similarly, if an employment contract requires you to give up certain freedoms, then it can be considered an invalid contract. And it should be illegal for companies to give contracts of this kind to potential employees to sign.

Agreed, but I don’t know what freedoms you’re talking about

Basically I believe employees should have the freedom to express their political beliefs, even if they are controversial, or if they are in disagreement with what their employers believe in.

Depends on the contract, if you want to be able to share your political beliefs and the contract says you can’t, don’t sign the contract.

What kyrie did wasn’t political, I don’t think

Like I said, contracts cannot take away your freedoms. If they do then they are unethical and should be illegal.

Like I said, that’s not reality

Singing the contract is voluntary, if you disagree with terms of the contract, negotiate or don’t sign.

what does this have to do with kyrie

This post was edited by SharpNips on Nov 10 2022 10:54am