it's actually 60 and was published by the police by the name "Vulnerable area". They are by defined a low socioeconomic status. The overall trend is that these areas are improving, that's what you probably don't want to mention from the report.
You can find such areas in every country worldwide.

"no go zones, muslim criminal blabla" is just propaganda

This post was edited by BaHgerAUT on Sep 14 2022 07:27am

So there are no go zones, but you don't call them that.
Hence, there are not any no go zones.
How is this not semantic word play?

Can you prove these areas existed prior to the mass immigration of "refugees"?

This post was edited by sirthom on Sep 14 2022 07:57am

The result of far-leftism in practice.

I wonder why all those Eastern European countries are all crime ridden shitholes with piss poor GDP but the population is almost 100% white.

Couldn't have anything to do with the USSR. They're white countries and we expect that historical economic inequality doesn't have an impact or else we might have to understand that immigrants are typically poor in European countries and that poverty might be the result of crime and not race. Darn.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 14 2022 08:10am

when for the 50k time in your life when you keep trying to blame race for crime and cannot make the connection of poverty/desperation=crime.

What poverty?
They get:
free housing
free pay check
free phone
free food
all voting rights

Hell, sign me up for some "poverty" please.

There's a consistent poverty risk that's approx 1/10. Of that population, immigrants are over 75% of that population. Yes, there's a massive financial gap between those entering the country via immigration as a result of economic inequality.

Just like White dominant Eastern Europe, economic inequality results in poor outcomes.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 14 2022 09:16am

Can't have that.
What more free stuff do you recommend they get?

BTW, why should the native Swedes want to help them at all?

More-so the result of Europe's status as a gaggle of compliant American satrapies.

America's wars in West Asia didn't only kill and impoverish people, they created at least 37 million refugees. Lots of those millions are internal refugees, but many of them are not and they head to Europe.

Europe by and large supported these wars. They fought in these wars to various degrees. They certainly didn't sanction America, or even just rhetorically challenge America over this, they just sighed and have served as the outlet for all these poor people whose lives America has upended. Refugees come to Europe with nothing, they don't speak the languages, their kids might have grown up with limited schooling depending on how long they lived under American violence. Indeed, many of them may have psychological issues from growing up in the ensuing chaos of disastrous American invasions. So it's a shock not just for these people, but the European governments that host them and need to deal with all these issues.

Europe needs to grow a spine and rather than treat the damage (accepting endless refugees) it needs to cut off the source of the damage (America's creation of refugees).

BTW, , aren't you always posting about God and Bible? Read it sometime, it's pretty clear on how refugees should be treated.

Because everyone is not like you. Simple. I have no problem paying tax to help a fellow individual. In fact, I pay over 50% in taxes. My quality of life is well beyond what I need.

Do I donate, no. Tax is enough for me. Do I think tax is administered well, no. Do I think the income tax act needs revisions, yes. Do tax brackets need to change, yes. Do I think welfare needs significant revamps, yes. But I have no issue contributing.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 14 2022 10:22am