d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Fox Used Completely Edited Photo.
Prev12345617Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 05:03pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 13 2022 03:59pm)
you're getting increasingly desperate, trying to defend faux news' stochastic terrorism.

did a self-proclaimed "news" channel use a photoshopped image in order to sic its viewers on a judge, or not? if yes, you should stop making excuses for them. bloody propaganda victims, lol...


How do you know that they are trying to sic viewers on a judge? You can read people's minds?
Member
Posts: 105,138
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Aug 13 2022 05:04pm


Adam Schiff still chairs the intelligence committee.

/thread
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Aug 13 2022 05:12pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 13 2022 05:34pm)
textbook relative privation fallacy by camboy. . could they be more of a hack if they tried to?
, used a PHOTOSHOPPED image in order to sic their unhinged viewers on a political opponent...


i'm sure the same hacks also downplayed bill o'reilly's campaign against dr. tiller...


Putting things in perspective is a fallacy!!!!

(the fallacy doesn't actually apply to what I said btw. The argument wasn't rejected because of the existence of a bigger problem. It was independently wrong)

Quote
it never happened
if it happened, it was meant as a joke / meme <--- camboy is also there
if it wasn't, other media does it all the time
if they don't, it's not so bad anyway - it's not like unhinged faux news viewers would ever kill people after listening to their propaganda
if they do, it's not faux' fault
if it is, what about the clintons / obama


Pasting this list does not mean its wrong.

Quote
we're not allowed to criticise blatant and dangerous propaganda because somewhere else people are starving / being bombed

No one says you are not allowed to criticize memes without doing your homework on what actually happened, you are just a gullible idiot for doing so and are not addressing significant real world problems in political discussion.

Wasting your life getting bent out of shape from TDS ragebait is embarrassing and stupid

Quote
imagine trying to downplay how the most popular "news" channel in america, which already has a long record of radicalising its viewers with hateful rhetoric and lies

Recognizing important context that shows you are wrong and a fool is not unjustly downplaying anything.

Their viewers should be radicalized against a corrupt FBI and government/politicians responsible for so many evils and negatives in the world.

A joke about a judge is not calling for violence. Another deranged fantasy, mindlessly parroted from unethical left-statist grifters just like the rest of your pathetic political worldview.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 13 2022 05:18pm
Member
Posts: 7,346
Joined: Jul 22 2021
Gold: 531.00
Aug 13 2022 05:50pm

Quote (fender @ Aug 13 2022 06:59pm)
you're getting increasingly desperate, trying to defend faux news' stochastic terrorism.

did a self-proclaimed "news" channel use a photoshopped image in order to sic its viewers on a judge, or not? if yes, you should stop making excuses for them. bloody propaganda victims, lol...


Quote (JessiWan @ Aug 13 2022 07:03pm)
How do you know that they are trying to sic viewers on a judge? You can read people's minds?


Yet we're the idiot conspiracy theorists :cry: :baby:

tell me Fender, are meme's violent hate speech? do pictures make you want to be violent?
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 05:54pm
Quote (JessiWan @ 14 Aug 2022 01:03)
How do you know that they are trying to sic viewers on a judge? You can read people's minds?


common sense. history. recognising blatantly obvious truths. all things you, camboy, and all the other faux news drones, apparently are not very familiar with...

defending literal fake news, smh...
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 05:57pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 13 2022 04:54pm)
common sense. history. recognising blatantly obvious truths. all things you, camboy, and all the other faux news drones, apparently are not very familiar with...

defending literal fake news, smh...

Prove that they are trying to sic viewers on a judge. If you can't, maybe you should shut up.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Aug 13 2022 06:01pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 05:57pm
Quote (WastedPenguinz @ 14 Aug 2022 01:50)
Yet we're the idiot conspiracy theorists :cry: :baby:

tell me Fender, are meme's violent hate speech? do pictures make you want to be violent?


no, but i'm not a faux "news" viewer:



Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 06:00pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 13 2022 04:57pm)


Someone who tried to attack the FBI is not a terrorist. He's a patriot.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 06:04pm
Quote (JessiWan @ 14 Aug 2022 01:57)
Can you or can you not read people's minds? If you can't, then you can't say they are trying to sic viewers on a judge.


pathetic, that's just fallacious kindergarten "logic". intelligent and critical thinking adults are able to recognise and acknowledge obvious truths and intentions, even without the ability to "read minds". your inability to pass even such a basic hurdle for a reasonable argument really speaks for itself. but hey, keep licking faux news boot, fascist...
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Aug 13 2022 06:05pm
Quote (JessiWan @ 14 Aug 2022 02:00)
Someone who tried to attack the FBI is not a terrorist. He's a patriot.


spoken like a true... TERRORIST. you're making my point here...
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345617Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll