nobody is so stupid that they cant see leftie lgbtq.. agenda for kids is a path way for pedofillia. so when they argue about it, its obvious what they are about.

Nah, you're mixing up lgbtq with Christianity.

Catholics, mormons, jehova's witnesses, southern baptists.

pretty much every sect of Christianity has a problem with defending and hiding pedophiles.

Pretty disgusting. Liberals lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/01/america-has-an-incest-problem/272459/

etc etc

Child abuse is more like a republican rural problem.

I remember a time when all this trans stuff was about being nice to those who are trans. Pretty sure it was never about grooming kids to dress like weirdos or encouraging them to become trans.

This post was edited by player11167 on May 24 2022 07:53am

Once again, everyone arguing over whose side is worse.
Can't you put aside the bi-partizan shit and just agree to burn them all?

stop arguing about it and say it
"pedofiles need to be prosecuted and locked up"




stop arguing about it and say it
"pedofiles need to be prosecuted and locked up"

I really am curious what fundamental changes are necessary, and the picture of the world you would wish to create?

i dont know where this crazy train is taking us.

as someone on the right, my concerns with the left being the conductor is that its seems like the track isnt even built.

the world will be an volatile place if the left agenda is, that anyone with an issue is allowed to lay track. theres no referee to the concerns for leftists. seems like, the smaller the minority, the more track they lay. but no one involved even knows where the destination is and wont stop crying until the destination is at their front door.

This post was edited by WastedPenguinz on May 24 2022 08:13am

this ^

i wonder how many pedophiles give one shit about politics. my guess is very few

The most important thing to the left is freedom.

The difference betwen the left and the right is actual vs potential freedom.

The right wants to maximize potential freedom. They want you to be able to theoretically do things. Like, if you have the money, you can say whatever you want on whatever outlet you want. You should be theoretically able to broadcast your message in any way you see fit, even if most access to this will only be available to a small few who can actually buy the air time and manipulate the message as they see fit.

The left wants to maximize actual freedom. It doesn't matter if you could potentially buy all the speech you want, if it's only available to an incredibly small few, then those small few will dominate the message.

The right wants you to potentially be able to buy healthcare if you are productive enough, and potentially be able to buy a house, and potentially be able to live a good life. It doesn't matter if that's only realistically avaiable to an increasingly small fraction of the population, as long as the potential is there, that is sufficient.

The left wants you to actually be able to live a good life regardless of circumstance. It is important that everybody have realistic access to the things required to live a good life, even if that comes at the expense of a small portion's theoretical freedom to infinitely merge their company. Everybody should have healthcare, not just potentially be able to access healthcare.



Does that give you a good foundation as to the world I wish to create?

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on May 24 2022 08:11am