Quote (sirthom @ Dec 21 2021 11:15am)
That thread was closed.
Didn't want you to think I was running away.
Here was my reply:
Ok chief, here it is.
The entire premise of the constitution is we have inalienable right that are granted by god and can not be taken away.
https://constitutionday.cpms.osd.mil/old/course2005To2008/508/course2.jpgEverything else is a guide of sorts to help us reach these goals.
I think perhaps you are to caught in legal/illegal, assuming that is the goal.
This has happened to many.
Legal/illegal are tools.
Tools used to get to what does matter, right and wrong.
So now the question becomes, is it wrong for someone to leave an agreement that only writes down rights.
Rights agreed by everyone who signed it, that was granted
only by god.
Well, is it?
just because a thread was closed doesnt mean you can't link me where u posted what you said you posted in response to what i said i posted.
unalienable rights argument brought up in a conflict that at it's heart was based in the right to own other human beings. you really are a treat.
post the link to the thread where u said what u said, im not going to engage in you shifting the goal posts to a mind numbingly silly premise that the confederacy was fighting for human rights. the history of the conflict is clear, it was due to the north and south differing on who could own slaves and profit from their labor, and the south's grievance with the north owning the textile mills that profited majorly off of the cotton it shipped north.