d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev123456424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 19099Replies: 4231Track Topic
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#31
Nov 1 2021 03:58pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Nov 1 2021 04:54pm)
The fact that it isn't a slam dunk means our civilization is declining due to lack of moral clarity.


This would never be a slam dunk. You've never been able to intentionally place yourself in danger because you want to enact violence on another.
Member
Posts: 33,358
Joined: Dec 20 2007
Gold: 11,245.00
#32
Nov 1 2021 03:59pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 1 Nov 2021 14:46)
He was guarding somebody else's property in a different state with an illegally posessed gun and was transported there by people who's explicit stated purpose was to enact violence on the rioters.

I'm not saying he won't get off on self defense, but it's not a slam dunk. They're gonna have to work for it.



Still ignoring the actual content of my post lol. Go back to the McDonalds bathroom.



See the above. History didn't start the second he was shot at.


You know that you and I are going to disagree on firearms laws.

ATF should be abolished and reformed as a convenience store.
Member
Posts: 29,003
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
#33
Nov 1 2021 04:06pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 1 2021 03:58pm)
This would never be a slam dunk. You've never been able to intentionally place yourself in danger because you want to enact violence on another.


Endless wore his Robin costume this year because they don't make a 5 foot 5 Batman costume.

Not for adults anyway..

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 1 2021 04:07pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#34
Nov 1 2021 04:06pm
Quote (Calipso @ Nov 1 2021 04:59pm)
You know that you and I are going to disagree on firearms laws.

ATF should be abolished and reformed as a convenience store.


Sure, but that doesn't have much bearing here.

He went with a group that specifically went there to enact violence.

If history started the moment Kyle got shot at then he would absolutely be entitled to an affirmative defense based on self-defense. But it didn't
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
#35
Nov 1 2021 04:10pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Nov 1 2021 02:54pm)
Kyle Rittenhouse shot a violent rapist and two pedophiles.

And these losers ^crunkt are trying to lie and say that he "shot into a crowd". :wacko:



The fact that it isn't a slam dunk means our civilization is declining due to lack of moral clarity.


The first guy.. The instigator was just released from a mental hospital. Hes on video calling people the N word and telling them to shoot him. Was a racist man

Mentally ill man attacks and chases down a 17 year old and ppl want him jailed my god

This post was edited by aaron9999 on Nov 1 2021 04:11pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
#36
Nov 1 2021 04:11pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 1 2021 06:06pm)
Sure, but that doesn't have much bearing here.

He went with a group that specifically went there to enact violence.

If history started the moment Kyle got shot at then he would absolutely be entitled to an affirmative defense based on self-defense. But it didn't


The defense will point out that he was defending a gas station, which he was. They will show video evidence of him being attacked by a raving crowd of violent rioters. And they will show him shooting two of those rioters in self-defense.

The video is compelling and clear-cut. If he was planning on starting a violent confrontation, which I've seen no evidence of, then antifa really should have given him the chance. What he did was clearly self-defense. If he broke gun laws, which seems probable, then he should be convicted on those lesser offenses.
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
#37
Nov 1 2021 04:12pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Nov 1 2021 03:11pm)
The defense will point out that he was defending a gas station, which he was. They will show video evidence of him being attacked by a raving crowd of violent rioters. And they will show him shooting two of those rioters in self-defense.

The video is compelling and clear-cut. If he was planning on starting a violent confrontation, which I've seen no evidence of, then antifa really should have given him the chance. What he did was clearly self-defense. If he broke gun laws, which seems probable, then he should be convicted on those lesser offenses.


there is no point in talking with that dude. Hes set in his views and is unable to admit when hes wrong. I'd go on go say I bet never in his life amited when he was wrong.

He doesn't care about what happened.
Banned
Posts: 20,182
Joined: Mar 1 2011
Gold: 0.05
Warn: 70%
#38
Nov 1 2021 04:17pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 1 2021 02:58pm)
This would never be a slam dunk. You've never been able to intentionally place yourself in danger because you want to enact violence on another.


That got to be the most stupidest thing I have ever seen someone say.


That's like saying a 30 year old man is beating a 90 year old up.

You step on to stop it and the 30 year old man attacks you. You end up shooting him. That's self defense

This post was edited by aaron9999 on Nov 1 2021 04:19pm
Member
Posts: 27,152
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
#39
Nov 1 2021 04:24pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 1 Nov 2021 17:54)
Kyle Rittenhouse shot a violent rapist and two pedophiles.



so if someone shot you then you would give them a thumbs up I supposed

Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#40
Nov 1 2021 04:24pm
Quote (aaron9999 @ Nov 1 2021 05:17pm)
That got to be the most stupidest thing I have ever seen someone say.


That's like saying a 30 year old man is beating a 90 year old up.

You step on to stop it and the 30 year old man attacks you. You end up shooting him. That's self defense


Not similar at all lol

Keep flailing
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123456424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact