They did flock to it, thats undeniable. And if you honestly ask yourself wether or not some "pleasured themselves" using the film - answer is "yes, ofcourse some of did"

Streisand effect with the message "left-wing Netflix greenlit this pedo garbage" - is a wonderful thing to have. Now its world reknown for what it is and who enabled it.

No "brigading" here, people found out what the content was and they rated it as they saw fit. All around pathetic arguments from you, scraping the bottom of the barrel HARD to save face. Expectedly, fail.

the level of introspection and analysis ive come to expect from your short stints in PARD, bravo.

as is per usual you're not even able to converse with people who agree generally with your viewpoint, they must accept your words as 100% true entirely or they get called a pedo. typical.

Examples please. Scrape that barrel so i can dunk on you again.

Did they flock? Yes.
Did they pleasure themselves? Ofcourse some did.
Streisand effect? Perfectly good thing, absolute win.

all "trash arguments" shut down, so much so that you resort to personal attack - rather than examine my answers.

try hard to find the decency to walk away in shame if this is the best you got

u started by saying i supported Cuties, and was a pedo. i corrected u, u ignored that, made a few block posts of strawman bullshit, and called it dunking.

u started wrong and didnt even self correct but want me to admit im wrong about what the pedos u track on twitter said a year ago or so. yuck man.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 28 2021 08:41am

You claim the factual coverage was "overblown" You support it even now. You have not changed my mind on what you are, not even in the slightest.

so saying i thought the reaction was a little hyperbolic but also that the movie shouldnt exist means the bolded?

you're being hyperbolic in response to me saying you and others were hyperbolic. you literally said i openly professed support for something im saying shouldnt exist lol.

u can say it, i wont "dunk" on you for admitting you remembered a bit wrong. its ok.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 28 2021 08:46am

imagine defending cuties and pedophiles by trying to downplay the normal rage against it.

Spending your entire life so angry must be tough on your heart.

"a little hyperbolic" is a little backtrack from "overblown".

You attacked the factual coverage of the film, doing so you put forth defense of the film. I called you out on this, asked "overblown how?" - all you could come up with were the following "trash arguments" & "strawman bullshit":

1) "Coverage .. implied that it was going to be something pedofiles would flock to"
2) "masturbate"
3) "Streisand effect"

Yes, they did flock.
Yes ofcourse they pleasured themselves
Streisand effect - great thing since people now know the facts thanks to it.
Also the crap about ratings being removed from netflix website - nobody cares, we have rotten tomatoes.

You dont present any further defense of your "trash arguments", rightfully so, they were pathetic. This resulted in you backtracking from "overblown" to "a little hyperbolic", but in the end you could prove neither. Coverage was fully justified.

Also from what i remember, you did not say anything closely resembling "the movie should not exist" at the time of its release. You claim the opposite? OK then.

this is the clown world that we have to deal with