You can't stop these moves.

secretly recording someone is a crime, this isn't an attack on free speech purely. it's a conflicting case of free speech versus privacy.

The Hulk Hogan Gawker sex tape is similar. Gawker has the free speech right to say as a press organization that Hulk Hogan cheated on his wife with his best friend's wife, in his home. They dont have the right to publish, as a press junket or otherwise under free speech protections, secretly recorded video or audio from the inside of the Hulkster's home.

Veritass is no different. Press video waivers exist for a reason, the human right to privacy under US law supersedes even the admission of illegal activity. This is a basic function of the 4th amendment's due process clause.

for a guy so in love with the constitution u sure dont understand its basic functions.

Of course, this "someone who is actually reliable" is conveniently a source that you trust.

Note, I am not defending Project Veritas. I am just saying that lefties themselves are biased, and this is reflected in their choice of news they consume.

By the way, you probably think snopes.com is an excellent fact-checking website, lol.

There is no inclusion of privacy within the fourth amendment.

I live in a one-party consent state, so things are a bit different here too.

the 4th amendment is a direct protection of privacy against potential evidence collected while in your home.

secret recording laws by private citizens are also not admissible evidence in a court of law, and further result in the recorder being potentially prosecuted. this is both a protection of privacy, increasingly important in a digitial age, and a way to dissuade vigilantism.

simplified: it is illegal to record someone without their consent and then publish those recordings. it may or may not be illegal to do the same and not publish depending on the case, but in any case the recordings are not admissible evidence in an American court of law.

This is like someone confessing to a police officer and getting mad when they forgot to pretend like they didnt know anything.

Is the anti-SJW shtick still working for Church?

thats actually the exact opposite of a privacy protection under the 4a.

Yes. Although, it was pretty funny in one of her videos she did the "Political Compass Quiz" and edited out her response to the abortion question, and then also Google'd "center right political compass result" and presented it as her actual score because her real score was left-of center.