Quote (MxVivianWulf @ Jun 2 2021 11:05am)
I don't need to expose anything. Everyone knows who you are. You expose yourself with every dumbass post.
I have never called someone a nazi without damn good justification either. Like I don't recall ever calling you a nazi for example - even though others would - I like to have a solid argument to prove my case before I go that far.
Humor us. What am I 'exposed' as exactly? Walk the tightrope and shine some light on your newest delusion.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 2 2021 10:44am)
the Irony of Gavin refusing to distance himself from Nazis while also standing up for his friends in prison that he also distanced himself from for legal reasons.
The Proud Boys aren't Nazis, because unlike Nazis when times get tough their leader won't an-hero he runs from them to avoid the legal ramifications of the movement he started getting well out of hand.
PB had plenty innocent enough roots, but the spiral was quick and Gavin was not without fault. He ran with the narrative that he was in danger on college campuses where he knew his speeches would not be received well, but would get him massive free PR. Milo, Gavin, Ben and many others made BANK by basically speaking in a leftist stronghold then called the overwhelming disagreement they knew was coming censorship to boost podcasts and sell books. They then furthered the narrative by claiming they needed protection, without an actual precedent for that, just threats. Ironically many would likely on a philosophical level call threats themselves thoughtcrime and protected 1A speech.
This is comprehensively wrong.
Mere disagreement was not what was being called censorship.
Speaking spots were sometimes cancelled or exorbitant security fees were charged.
Mobs of leftists were trying to disrupt, cancel and shutdown events.
They falsely equated speech they didnt like with violence and wanted to deplatform different views.
There were a number of violent 'protests' and attacks at conservative speaking events, not 'just' threats. - This invalidates a few of your points.
None of them are claiming threats of violence are protected first amendment speech, not 'many' of them.

'it was just disagreement!'
Yes they did profit off of it because the leftist mobs were in fact disgusting and a joke that every sensible person didn't like.