To take it a step farther than I did in my last post: Why are progressives now intent on subsidizing professional sports? There's been a huge push for decades to stop subsidizing sports, both at the professional and collegiate level. Sports which can survive based on the product they provide (entertainment) can survive, those that can't can fail, same as any other private business. No matter what year you look at it, lengthy articles have been written for decades that're highly critical of sports subsidies. Here's just one example of such an article:
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/12/how-taxpayers-keep-the-nfl-rich/418971/Quite frankly, this is one area where I'm in perfect agreement with the long-established progressive opinion. Professional sports leagues are private businesses. There is no reason whatsoever they should be receiving any subsidies at all. There is no reason the Pentagon should be paying millions to incentivize the leagues to honor veterans and the national guard. There is no reason why cities should foot the bill for anything related to professional sports.
The problem with the republican backed bill in Texas isn't that it's attempting to hold private businesses to a standard of civic pride in order to retain public subsidies. The problem with the republican backed bill is that it allows the public subsidies of these private companies to continue at all. The NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, etc. will all do just fine if they have to pay their own way. Why should citizens who don't care about sports be forced to fund these private institutions they care nothing about?