Quote (duffman316 @ Apr 4 2021 07:55pm)
i didn't say to like it, i expected you would defend it on libertarian principles
that lady is essentially trespassing if she refuses to follow the rules she must obey to pass through someone else's private property so they called the cops to have her removed
if anything the old lady violated the nap by refusing to follow the rules and refusing to leave
I agree there is that element to the story, but as I have explained and will explain further its more complicated than that.
-Ridiculous Mask mandates as a result of government policies.
-Government created and subsidized Bank cartels unilaterally changing their terms to bar people from withdrawing their funds and closing their account.
-Agents of the state abusing and arresting elderly women at the behest of banksters.
None of this is ideal from a libertarian and human perspective.
Like I was saying, I can strongly disagree with actions of so-called private businesses and dislike some aspects of the story.
""It'S a PrIvAtE bUsInEsS" lacks any and all nuance.
We are 100% in support of private property rights but that doesn't mean we can't criticize private companies over their decisions. " -Libertarian Party of Kentucky
"It's a private company, yes. That doesn't mean I can't criticize their business practices and push for them to make changes. That doesn't mean I won't fight them to not censor views i disagree with. They can refuse. And I have a right to complain." - former LP presidential candidate Austin Petersen