d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Income Taxes, What Would Your Policy Be?
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Mar 10 2021 02:45pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 10 Mar 2021 12:35)
3 to 4 year old special education. mainly autistic children with a lower number of kids with physical issues, deafness, blindness, etc. But mostly autistic kids, at an age where they're not legally allowed to diagnose autism, with parents who know this and almost all hold out hope that their kids arent autistic, and then scream at my wife over ZOOM when their kid cant enter normal kindergarten even though they do zero at home.


Ugh. Autistic children are a severe chore. I have nothing but sympathy for their parents, teachers, care providers, etc. Youngest brother is autistic. He was homeschooled. Broken home, here. Didn't grow up with my mother, but father instead. However, my brothers both raised by my mother, who was stay at home, while her second husband worked. She did alright with my little brothers. But her method of teaching, discipline, and reward did not vary between either of my brothers. Autistic was not an excuse to her. I tend to think, whenever possible, this is the best way. I'm fully aware it doesn't always work, but when it does or can, it should be utilized. The habit of today's parents to raise their children as "special" is insane. And the complete lack of any personal responsibility should be held against the stay at home parents your wife deals with specifically, not all stay at home parents of dual parent households. The "I'm paying you even though really it's my tax credits that're paying you" crowd that shirks any responsibility whatsoever for their own children is just not good.
Member
Posts: 92,996
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 10 2021 02:49pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Mar 10 2021 02:45pm)
Ugh. Autistic children are a severe chore. I have nothing but sympathy for their parents, teachers, care providers, etc. Youngest brother is autistic. He was homeschooled. Broken home, here. Didn't grow up with my mother, but father instead. However, my brothers both raised by my mother, who was stay at home, while her second husband worked. She did alright with my little brothers. But her method of teaching, discipline, and reward did not vary between either of my brothers. Autistic was not an excuse to her. I tend to think, whenever possible, this is the best way. I'm fully aware it doesn't always work, but when it does or can, it should be utilized. The habit of today's parents to raise their children as "special" is insane. And the complete lack of any personal responsibility should be held against the stay at home parents your wife deals with specifically, not all stay at home parents of dual parent households. The "I'm paying you even though really it's my tax credits that're paying you" crowd that shirks any responsibility whatsoever for their own children is just not good.


my wife has a mother of her student this year, stay at home mom, SEVERE anger issues, screams to communicate, even with child on her lap for the ZOOM conference. angrily turned down materials to help her son progress at home in first meeting. 2nd meeting screamed that her sons anger issues werent getting better, with him on her lap, and screamed she was going to school to be an "autistic teacher" because my wife had failed her son. kid learns anger first hand is the way to act, she denies materials to help, then screams hes too angry and shes going to get a bachelors overnight to fix him.
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Mar 10 2021 02:51pm
Personal allowance up to £15k (0% tax)
£15,000 - £65,000 @ 15%
£65,000 - £150,000 @ 30%
£150,000+ @ 40%

Something like that. The taxation system must be progressive and the tax boundaries will have to change every few years to prevent fiscal drag
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Mar 10 2021 03:12pm
12% flat tax. Deductions only for married couples with children.

Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 10 2021 02:18pm)
Bring back the 94% tax rate from the 40s. 'Billionaires' shouldn't be a thing.


This is a myth. The rich just found ways around it they never actually paid 90%.

This is also the reason for the complete econimic disaster of the 70’s

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 10 2021 03:49pm)
my wife has a mother of her student this year, stay at home mom, SEVERE anger issues, screams to communicate, even with child on her lap for the ZOOM conference. angrily turned down materials to help her son progress at home in first meeting. 2nd meeting screamed that her sons anger issues werent getting better, with him on her lap, and screamed she was going to school to be an "autistic teacher" because my wife had failed her son. kid learns anger first hand is the way to act, she denies materials to help, then screams hes too angry and shes going to get a bachelors overnight to fix him.


Single moms are a plague

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Mar 10 2021 03:24pm
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Mar 10 2021 03:15pm
Quote (dro94 @ Mar 10 2021 03:51pm)
Personal allowance up to £15k (0% tax)
£15,000 - £65,000 @ 15%
£65,000 - £150,000 @ 30%
£150,000+ @ 40%

Something like that. The taxation system must be progressive and the tax boundaries will have to change every few years to prevent fiscal drag


I dont think id ever want to see taxes above 30%. Spending almost half my day working for the government to mismanage my earnings isn't my idea of an ideal society. If anything i should have a stronger say in how funds are managed if its my dollars being used to prop up society.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 10 2021 03:19pm
20% flat tax with no automatic witholding for taxes. people must write a check quarterly and government must spend accordingly. if we must have progressive tax system cap it at like 30%.

This post was edited by excellence on Mar 10 2021 03:20pm
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 10 2021 03:29pm
20-25% national sales tax to replace the income tax, with exemptions for essentials like food, clothing, primary housing etc.
Member
Posts: 29,006
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Mar 10 2021 03:35pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Mar 10 2021 02:15pm)
I dont think id ever want to see taxes above 30%. Spending almost half my day working for the government to mismanage my earnings isn't my idea of an ideal society. If anything i should have a stronger say in how funds are managed if its my dollars being used to prop up society.


You're Canadian. If you make any significant income you're going to see that number pretty quickly. Im Canadian and i'm at 55%.

I mean even a salary of 125K in Ontario before other payroll taxes like CPP and EI will result in you having a 30% average tax rate and a 44%ish marginal rate. By the time you factor in CPP and EI you're getting up there.

Sorry man but you already see 30% probably. Sure RRSP deductions will bring you down a bit but unless you have some other significant losses to use up you're there!

This post was edited by SBD on Mar 10 2021 03:38pm
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Mar 10 2021 03:40pm
Quote (SBD @ Mar 10 2021 04:35pm)
You're Canadian. If you make any significant income you're going to see that number pretty quickly. Im Canadian and i'm at 55%.

I mean even a salary of 125K in Ontario before other payroll taxes like CPP and EI will result in you having a 30% average tax rate and a 44%ish marginal rate. By the time you factor in CPP and EI you're getting up there.


Thats kind of why tax policy is my first concern when it comes to voting. Don't think I'd ever vote ndp who want to come after my investments on top of our high taxes.

This post was edited by duffman316 on Mar 10 2021 03:41pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Mar 10 2021 03:55pm
Social Security should be replaced by a national investment fund, with the end result that the country owns a substantial share of the gross domestic product and can therefore supplement tax revenue with economic production.

It would be ideal to reduce income tax rates for the middle / upper-middle class, but our immediate need is to balance the deficit and target inflation of 3%, thereby reducing the purchasing power of the national debt over time.

We should also look at implementing a national VAT.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll