Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 5 2021 11:52pm)
The key word being "surpluses". Right now, the rich countries do not have surpluses of vaccines, and it would not be justifiable (or politically feasible!) for them to send relevant quantities of vaccines to poor countries while their own population isnt vaccinated yet and suffering from various degrees of lockdowns or restrictions as a result.
Regarding the blocked shipment: AZ agreed in its contracts with the EU to deliver a certain amount of vaccines to the EU and has failed to follow up on it. The delivery goals were attached to a "best efforts" clause, which was a huge lapse by the EU's negotiating team, and is the reason why the EU did not invoke export control until now. But when it comes to the shipment to Australia, the Italian government determined - rightfully in my opinion - that they violate the "best efforts to keep our promises to the EU"-clause.
I'm a bit indifferent on this move tbh. Ethically/morally/legally, the Italian government is probably in the right on this one, but it is of course a move which will lead to diplomatic tensions and the AZ vaccine is crap anyway.
What leads you to think the AZ vaccine is crap?
Valid point on the negotiations. I think the EU has dropped the ball there, although they are entitled to work for the interest of the blocs members.
It does get uncomfortable for them however, in that it could be seen as protectionism on a continental scale.
I think the evolved argument against this move, is that european countries are having slow uptake of vaccines.
Vaccine skepticism in France for example is really high. So is it justified to block vaccines to countries where they will definitely be used more quickly, in order to keep them in european countries that are seeing a slow uptake in delivery.