d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Big Tech Strikes Back
Prev12345641Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 9 2021 11:06am
Quote (MizzouFTW @ Jan 9 2021 12:06pm)
She wasn't. Do I need to go back and find that quote you gave on her? Because your true colors came out there. You edited it but I have it quoted in one of these threads.

Dude I'm all for justice. IDGAF if R or D. But she wasn't doing anything but sleeping and it was a piss poor performance by the officers.


Oh boy here we go.
Member
Posts: 29,006
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Jan 9 2021 11:23am
Big tech strikes back at the end of his term when he can't pose a threat to executive and management bonuses by disrupting the companies. It's pretty amusing.
Member
Posts: 1,203
Joined: Jan 3 2018
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 9 2021 02:29pm
Quote (SBD @ Jan 9 2021 11:23am)
Big tech strikes back at the end of his term when he can't pose a threat to executive and management bonuses by disrupting the companies. It's pretty amusing.


You guys think Trump has far more power than he does. You're the same people that screamed about Obama overreaching
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Jan 9 2021 02:35pm
Quote (MizzouFTW @ Jan 9 2021 09:06am)
She wasn't. Do I need to go back and find that quote you gave on her? Because your true colors came out there. You edited it but I have it quoted in one of these threads.

Dude I'm all for justice. IDGAF if R or D. But she wasn't doing anything but sleeping and it was a piss poor performance by the officers.


I agree insofar as I still believe a properly executed noknock would have prevented the shootout
Member
Posts: 29,006
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Jan 9 2021 02:40pm
Quote (MizzouFTW @ Jan 9 2021 01:29pm)
You guys think Trump has far more power than he does. You're the same people that screamed about Obama overreaching


I think he had disruption power. I think that was pretty clear earlier in his term when Chinese stocks tanked for quite some time after his plans and remarks.

It just wouldn't have been good for business until it was known with 100% certinity he and the Congressman and women that support him could no longer have a significant impact on business.

I'm speculating obviously but that's just my big picture thoughts. Why else wouldn't they have done this long ago? There's many times where you could have used the same reasoning.

This post was edited by SBD on Jan 9 2021 02:43pm
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Jan 9 2021 02:40pm
Quote (proccy @ 9 Jan 2021 12:35)
I agree insofar as I still believe a properly executed noknock would have prevented the shootout


Am I remembering wrong? I thought they determined she was a low-risk target, and the no-knock was rescinded?

I may be confusing cases. But if there was a no-knock still in play, I agree.
Member
Posts: 41,270
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 1,788.71
Jan 9 2021 02:49pm
I’ve been suspended for less on league of legends

They are private companies. Don’t use their service then? If 74 million Americans have an issue that is a significant hit to these companies finances. Do these individuals have the backbone to back their view with action? If an affected individual feels they have legal recourse you are more than welcome to go to court

Bannon was worse arguably than Alex Jones

Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 9 2021 02:52pm
Quote (Bazi @ Jan 9 2021 02:49pm)
I’ve been suspended for less on league of legends

They are private companies. Don’t use their service then? If 74 million Americans have an issue that is a significant hit to these companies finances. Do these individuals have the backbone to back their view with action? If an affected individual feels they have legal recourse you are more than welcome to go to court

Bannon was worse arguably than Alex Jones


They always start a new platform, then quickly realize without moderation and control it devolves into a safe-haven for pedophiles and terrorists, then quickly implement almost identical rules to YouTube or Twitter. Even Alex Jones forums have censorship for this exact reason.
Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Jul 13 2020
Gold: 0.00
Jan 9 2021 03:43pm
Quote (Bazi @ Jan 9 2021 09:49pm)
I’ve been suspended for less on league of legends

They are private companies. Don’t use their service then? If 74 million Americans have an issue that is a significant hit to these companies finances. Do these individuals have the backbone to back their view with action? If an affected individual feels they have legal recourse you are more than welcome to go to court


This.
Facebook can decide tomorrow to ban you for life for using the word 'puppies' and legally you can't do shit about it.

I don't know who Bannon is, so I'll refrain from commenting.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 9 2021 04:25pm
Quote (SBD @ 9 Jan 2021 12:23)
Big tech strikes back at the end of his term when he can't pose a threat to executive and management bonuses by disrupting the companies. It's pretty amusing.

precisely. 230 wasnt struck down, the monolithic tech oligarchy cabal has the American legislature (house and senate both) by the balls.

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 9 2021 04:28pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345641Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll