d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > White Liberal Saviorism
Prev1234567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 4 2020 08:58pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 4 2020 09:55pm)
Liberal forces are shooting themselves in the foot when they constantly change their own terminology because they've found yet another group of oppressed people or feel the need to let the world know that group A is even more oppressed than group B. At some point, those not engaged in these debates stop taking them serious.

A prime example is the evolution of the terminology used for the fight for sexual inclusion:

"Gay rights"
"Gay and Lesbian rights"
LGBT
LGBTQ
LGBTIQ
LGBTIQ*
LGBTIQ*#§~%&


This is a supremely dumb argument.

Its akin to saying "we fought to save the jews, then gave the blacks rights, and now the gays want rights? This is just too much! When will it end!"
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jul 4 2020 09:04pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 5 Jul 2020 04:58)
This is a supremely dumb argument.

Its akin to saying "we fought to save the jews, then gave the blacks rights, and now the gays want rights? This is just too much! When will it end!"


No. Those examples you gave are materially different cases. What I was talking about is changing the language with which activists are talking about one and the same issue, about making it ever more granular.
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 5 2020 12:18am
Member
Posts: 58,281
Joined: Jul 10 2006
Gold: 2,900.49
Jul 5 2020 02:45am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 4 2020 07:55pm)
Liberal forces are shooting themselves in the foot when they constantly change their own terminology because they've found yet another group of oppressed people or feel the need to let the world know that group A is even more oppressed than group B. At some point, those not engaged in these debates stop taking them serious.

A prime example is the evolution of the terminology used for the fight for sexual inclusion:

"Gay rights"
"Gay and Lesbian rights"
LGBT
LGBTQ
LGBTIQ
LGBTIQ*
LGBTIQ*#§~%&



LGBTBBBQ.

The extra B is for BYOBB.
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Jul 5 2020 02:50am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 5 2020 04:55am)
Liberal forces are shooting themselves in the foot when they constantly change their own terminology because they've found yet another group of oppressed people or feel the need to let the world know that group A is even more oppressed than group B. At some point, those not engaged in these debates stop taking them serious.

A prime example is the evolution of the terminology used for the fight for sexual inclusion:

"Gay rights"
"Gay and Lesbian rights"
LGBT
LGBTQ
LGBTIQ
LGBTIQ*
LGBTIQ*#§~%&


Isn't it shocking that liberals want to just accept everyone regardless of sexual orientation or identity?
The terminology is a bit silly indeed, but let's not forget that this terminology is just as important for conservatives. If liberals are supporting the LGBTIQ*#§~%& community, you can bet your ass that conservatives will want to oppress that community and pretend it's a mental disorder.

This post was edited by Leevee on Jul 5 2020 02:52am
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jul 5 2020 09:20am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 4 2020 10:58pm)
This is a supremely dumb argument.

Its akin to saying "we fought to save the jews, then gave the blacks rights, and now the gays want rights? This is just too much! When will it end!"


The Liberal Gay Rights movement mirrors the Biblical cycle of Cain and Abel.

In the first step, Cain makes an inadequate sacrifice to God while his brother Abel makes a proper sacrifice.

Cain grieves because he thinks he deserves favor even though he was incompetent. He plots to take a stone to his brother's head.

In the end Cain kills Abbel, flattening the heirarchy of man and leaving nothing honorable for men to aspire to, and creating the world's first Marxist utopia.

Pretending to vindicate the dispossessed always ends tragically like this.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Jul 5 2020 09:38am
Quote (Leevee @ Jul 5 2020 04:50am)
Isn't it shocking that liberals want to just accept everyone regardless of sexual orientation or identity?
The terminology is a bit silly indeed, but let's not forget that this terminology is just as important for conservatives. If liberals are supporting the LGBTIQ*#§~%& community, you can bet your ass that conservatives will want to oppress that community and pretend it's a mental disorder.


Quoted for truth.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jul 5 2020 09:48am
Quote (Skinned @ Jul 5 2020 08:38am)
Quoted for truth.


Quote (Leevee @ Jul 5 2020 01:50am)
Isn't it shocking that liberals want to just accept everyone regardless of sexual orientation or identity?
The terminology is a bit silly indeed, but let's not forget that this terminology is just as important for conservatives. If liberals are supporting the LGBTIQ*#§~%& community, you can bet your ass that conservatives will want to oppress that community and pretend it's a mental disorder.


There are a couple in here that have stated just that
Mental disorder
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jul 5 2020 09:51am
Quote (Leevee @ Jul 5 2020 04:50am)
Isn't it shocking that liberals want to just accept everyone regardless of sexual orientation or identity?
The terminology is a bit silly indeed, but let's not forget that this terminology is just as important for conservatives. If liberals are supporting the LGBTIQ*#§~%& community, you can bet your ass that conservatives will want to oppress that community and pretend it's a mental disorder.


Sure from 10,000 feet the perspective is about acceptance. Then you get into the weeds and see gay couples driving past 20 bakeries to ferret out the one christian one, forcing nuns to provide birth control, forcing catholic hospitals to provide abortions and gender reassignment surgeries, forcing doctors to administer life long impact hormone treatments which go against our own basic biological development, forcing doctors to mutilate people even if they don't agree with the ethics and so on.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Jul 5 2020 09:51am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Jul 5 2020 10:07am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 5 2020 11:51am)
Sure from 10,000 feet the perspective is about acceptance. Then you get into the weeds and see gay couples driving past 20 bakeries to ferret out the one christian one, forcing nuns to provide birth control, forcing catholic hospitals to provide abortions and gender reassignment surgeries, forcing doctors to administer life long impact hormone treatments which go against our own basic biological development, forcing doctors to mutilate people even if they don't agree with the ethics and so on.


Nobody is forcing catholic hospitals to give abortions. Again you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. They have control over that and will not even let their doctors prescribe birth control for non-contraceptive reasons. Gender reassignment isn't emergency life saving surgery.

Your post is completely incorrect and you're an idiot for uncritically parroting shit you hear in your circle jerk echo chamber. You are outraged over complete fiction. You are gulluble AF.

I rebuke thee for this garbage post.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jul 5 2020 10:08am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll