When you go out of your way to remove them from media it is censorship.

When you buy ads with the explicit purpose of influencing the media to downplay the scientific consensus, it is censorship.

When you are lobbying to remove science from the science class, it is censorship.

You guys are using a loose definition of censorship when it is convenient and a strict one when it isn't. I could just as easily say that Google restricting its ad sense to websites that advertisers want their material on is within their purview, and not censorship, since nobody is stopping the federalist from being hosted or writing, and I would be making the argument using a 1 to 1 correspondence with the logic you just used.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 16 2020 10:18pm

in other news, the sun is hot.

No, that's just not a truthful description of what was going on. Attempts to make climate change denial stick have failed. Attempts at replacing a scientific worldview with creationism have largely failed. Attempts at keeping gays out of the mainstream have totally failed. Attempts at maintaining wedlock as the social norm have failed. (Remember how an extramarital affair was still a career-threatening scandal for a politician back in the 90s?)

The correct description is that conservatives have been gradually losing every culture wars battle since the 1960s, with the difference over the last decade being that they have now gotten so weak that they cant muster any kind of relevant offense anymore (like they still could in the 2000s) and are now purely on the defensive. The reason for this is the left's stranglehold on all sorts of opinion-forming institutions.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jun 17 2020 12:58am

Google should perhaps not be the ones to determine whether some other website is sufficiently racist to deserve economic annihilation.
Also, sole reason The Federalist escaped demonetization is that they gave in and agreed to censor their comment section according to Google's rules.

They are publishing damaging content, this has a huge indirect cost to the society, and they should be punished for that.
Because they are claiming it's real news, this make them responsible of the commentaries they get on the website.

Google is still asscancer tho.

/nb: solution should be to labelize this content as "fictional news" with a big red logo.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Jun 17 2020 03:49am

There was this guy... Santara, who posted how Google was evil in direct contravention of their moot "don't be evil" a lot longer ago than that, and PaRD didn't agree then either.

Proving once again how vicious and unaware PaRD can be.

It's all funny for you to post dumb false or fake, conspiracists, memes, till the day you learn someone did some mass murders and got his ideas through the internet shit you posted. Such a great freedom lol

Lemme get the straight... you're gonna blame ME for psychopaths? Have I got that right?



/e ...and this coming from a guy who posts nothing but divisive, inciting pics, comments, etc.?

This post was edited by Ghot on Jun 17 2020 05:41am