Post after post and year after year of you getting destroyed and not being capable of refuting what I say must really take a toll.

After all this time your 'best' strategy is to ignore what I say and falsely call me a white nationalist to derail the discussion. Absolutely pathetic.

you can't even read. you're a white nationalism APOLOGIST. i mean, to be fair, there are only so many reasons for that, but it could very well just be an ego or an edgy teenager thing for you. the former is apparently incredibly fragile in you, and the latter is also supported by your silly 'libertarian' shtick that has no ideological substance to it.

maybe you simply can't admit you're wrong for making excuses for white nationalists, maybe you're ideologically adjacent, maybe you're just trying to be edgy. i don't know and to be honest, i don't really care. it's disgusting and vile either way.

He's clearly one of them.. Spends so much time trying to deflect with.
"i am so smart just ask me bs" is so exhausting.. like a 4 year old that keeps asking "why?" at some point you just stop answering

Fender vs cambo is like watching a mirror match.

To be fair, I wont take all the credit here.
This happens with virtually everyone else who disagrees with you as well.
Low IQ rants and name calling and the same array of buzzwords is your response.

Daring to question an SPLC article you like is enough in your mind to justify calling me a white nationalist and white nationalist 'apologist'.
It couldn't possibly be that the SPLC is a smear site that SHOULD be scrutinized.

Actually analyzing the content of what someone else says and taking it into consideration never enters the equation for you, let alone providing a reasoned response with legitimate points.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Apr 30 2020 08:17pm

i'm not entirely sure you understand how mirrors work, lol.



well he sure does a lot of mental gymnastics to defend them at every opportunity. but again, could just be an ego thing: his hate for 'the left' certainly makes him kneejerk rationalise whatever 'the right' does - and now he has to pretend like all he's doing is 'being fair and rational' when making excuses for white nationalists.

there's a reason he's so insecure about his intelligence. hanlon's razor suggests he might not actually be one of them after all. but again, that obviously doesn't mean it's not repulsive and intellectually rotten either way...

Yes we know you think its evil and rotten to disagree with the left.

Now that you've tacitly admitted you were lying and that i'm not a white nationalist you should profusely apologize and try not to be a garbage person in the future

You can also go back and recognize you were wrong about gun control and that lying about people to deflect from addressing that is not a respectable or legitimate thing to do.

reading comprehension remains a massive challenge for you, i see. you strawmanning my arguments does not mean i'm 'lying'.

what i'm saying is that considering your fragile ego, your unhealthy obsession and simplistic understanding of 'the left', and your justified insecurity about your intelligence, it's POSSIBLE that you might not be a white nationalist yourself - but then again, i never claimed that. what is UNDENIABLY true, however, is that you're a white nationalist apologist - and that is the 'repulsive and intellectually rotten' part, which of course still applies.

also, to be fair, the post you quoted there was not addressed to you, so i didn't feel the need to use the crayon version. you're welcome for this clarification though.

No. We've already determined your faculties are defective.



Right, but you making intentionally false statements does.


Unsupported superficial blathering.

Another example of your unwillingness to accept the fact that other people can be informed and have valid and legitimate beliefs that conflict with your leftist worldview.



You have falsely claimed both on various occasions.

No, thats not 'undeniably true'. You are lying again.
Scrutinizing arguments and sources, and disagreeing with you does not make someone a white nationalist or apologist.
Rather just someone who values the truth and values intellectual rigor and does not like falsely smearing people with nonsense.
Your anti-intellectualism and emotionally compromised hatred contrasts with those traits.
You are a near-opposite. Content to copy/paste smears and then smear people who don't agree with it. Trash.

here's an idea, camboy: if it triggers you so hard to be called a white nationalist apologist, why don't you just try... i don't know... maybe not constantly making excuses for obvious white nationalists like stephen miller and other alt-right scum?

until you can manage that, you very much deserve the label - no matter how much you bitch about it, denying your own post history...