d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Gross Abuse Of Power > Census Citizenship Question
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,036
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Jun 13 2019 04:20am
Quote (thundercock @ Jun 12 2019 09:33pm)
The Constitution is pretty clear on the issue of representation IMO. Non-voters and slaves have always been represented (though slaves counted as 3/5ths) so I believe that immigrants, regardless of legal status, need to be counted in the census. After all, everyone is taxed!

While there is merit to citizenship question from a data perspective, the reasons given by the Trump administration are clearly bullshit. Who the fuck would believe that this administration has ANY interest in enforcing the Voting Rights Act. LOL!


Pretty clear? What about "Indians not taxed?" They weren't counted in the census. Because they weren't citizens. "Non voters" are counted because not everyone who is a citizen is a voter (children). And the 3/5 Compromise makes it pretty clear that states that had slaves WANTED inflated population numbers to expand their voice in Congress. Slaves weren't citizens but the South wanted them counted anyways. The free North didn't want to count non citizens. That's the whole reason they had to have a compromise.
Member
Posts: 48,944
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 21.93
Jun 13 2019 04:47am
Gross abuse of power is giving the highest medal available to civilians to Art Laffer because he wrote a book praising trump.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jun 13 2019 04:47am
Quote (Santara @ Jun 13 2019 05:20am)
Pretty clear? What about "Indians not taxed?" They weren't counted in the census. Because they weren't citizens. "Non voters" are counted because not everyone who is a citizen is a voter (children). And the 3/5 Compromise makes it pretty clear that states that had slaves WANTED inflated population numbers to expand their voice in Congress. Slaves weren't citizens but the South wanted them counted anyways. The free North didn't want to count non citizens. That's the whole reason they had to have a compromise.


Maybe we can make another compromise and agree that they're 3/5ths a citizen?
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jun 13 2019 05:15am
Quote (CarsV @ 12 Jun 2019 19:46)
I don't see any reason NOT to ask whether people are citizens or not. If we're going to provide healthcare, housing, etc., to illegals or undocumented people, we, American citizens, damn well deserve to know who is in our country. The electoral college is based on population and Democrats just want to "farm" more votes. The tragedy of Lincoln...


I mean you shit on dermrocrats for wanting immigrants but there are right-wing orgs that support full-on open borders because they recognise the fiscal benefits of immigration. The Cato institute is a good example... and other Libertarian think tanks and groups are pretty much in line with this thought.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jun 13 2019 05:22am
Quote (Santara @ Jun 13 2019 05:20am)
Pretty clear? What about "Indians not taxed?" They weren't counted in the census. Because they weren't citizens. "Non voters" are counted because not everyone who is a citizen is a voter (children). And the 3/5 Compromise makes it pretty clear that states that had slaves WANTED inflated population numbers to expand their voice in Congress. Slaves weren't citizens but the South wanted them counted anyways. The free North didn't want to count non citizens. That's the whole reason they had to have a compromise.


The genocide was pretty taxing, was it not?

You say taxation is theft, and we didn't tax the Indians, but we fucking stole from the Indians in way worse ways than taxation within the social contract.

If you're looking for lessons on how to marginalize other people then they would be a good example to follow as they supported slavery and genocide.

I don't care to follow their example because I disagree with their values.

I'm more of a John Brown fan personally. We should put him on a coin.
Member
Posts: 2,808
Joined: Nov 21 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jun 13 2019 06:33am
Quote (TransTankie @ Jun 13 2019 11:15am)
I mean you shit on dermrocrats for wanting ILLEGAL immigrants but there are right-wing orgs that support full-on open borders because they recognise the fiscal benefits of ILLEGAL immigration. The Cato institute is a good example... and other Libertarian think tanks and groups are pretty much in line with this thought.


Get it right. It's not that hard.

Yes, there are Republicans and right-wing interests in exploiting illegal immigrants. But, by and large, it's the Dems who stand to gain the most from them. Dem politicians view them as potential, life-long constituents to the point Dem politicians out west are literally trying to dilute the concept of American citizenship by providing more and more benefits to illegals, inching closer and closer to see what they can get away with. Nice try with the whataboutism, but it's no secret and anybody wide awake can see it. Go on left-leaning, pro Democrat news networks and notice the narrative towards illegal immigration.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/record-number-undocumented-immigrants-flooded-southern-border-may-n1014186
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/new-border-surge-prompts-10-jump-in-2019-prediction-to-1-072-000-illegal-immigrants

Nearly 150,000 in the month of May alone. That's like a small American city, in one month. Granted most of them probably won't stay. But that's where the Dems are at fault, they're literally trying to hold up signs saying "Come here! Stay here! We'll even provide for you!" And of course they'll keep coming lol.

This post was edited by CarsV on Jun 13 2019 06:42am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jun 13 2019 07:48am
Quote (CarsV @ Jun 13 2019 07:33am)
Get it right. It's not that hard.

Yes, there are Republicans and right-wing interests in exploiting illegal immigrants. But, by and large, it's the Dems who stand to gain the most from them. Dem politicians view them as potential, life-long constituents to the point Dem politicians out west are literally trying to dilute the concept of American citizenship by providing more and more benefits to illegals, inching closer and closer to see what they can get away with. Nice try with the whataboutism, but it's no secret and anybody wide awake can see it. Go on left-leaning, pro Democrat news networks and notice the narrative towards illegal immigration.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/record-number-undocumented-immigrants-flooded-southern-border-may-n1014186
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/new-border-surge-prompts-10-jump-in-2019-prediction-to-1-072-000-illegal-immigrants

Nearly 150,000 in the month of May alone. That's like a small American city, in one month. Granted most of them probably won't stay. But that's where the Dems are at fault, they're literally trying to hold up signs saying "Come here! Stay here! We'll even provide for you!" And of course they'll keep coming lol.


Why would a group of people who are overwhelmingly Christian, pro-life, catholic, with very very traditional family values, be automatic lifelong democrats?

You guys keep saying this but it isn't very realistic.
Member
Posts: 91,061
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jun 13 2019 07:53am
Quote (Skinned @ Jun 13 2019 07:48am)
Why would a group of people who are overwhelmingly Christian, pro-life, catholic, with very very traditional family values, be automatic lifelong democrats?

You guys keep saying this but it isn't very realistic.


because the democrats aren't trying to send them back to their country of origin.

would you rather vote for someone you agree with or someone who might be the difference between you being here or in Honduras?

also a bit funny that religious convictions are unbreakable when the left wants them to be and just a facade when the left wants them to be. and by the left i mean you :P
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jun 13 2019 10:17am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 13 2019 08:53am)
because the democrats aren't trying to send them back to their country of origin.

would you rather vote for someone you agree with or someone who might be the difference between you being here or in Honduras?

also a bit funny that religious convictions are unbreakable when the left wants them to be and just a facade when the left wants them to be. and by the left i mean you :P


A lot of Hispanics vote Republican as evidenced by Bush and Romney. The Republicans brought them here lol. They just seem to be done using them and wish to discard them now?

This post was edited by Skinned on Jun 13 2019 10:22am
Member
Posts: 91,061
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jun 13 2019 10:22am
Quote (Skinned @ Jun 13 2019 10:17am)
A lot of Hispanics vote Republican as evidenced by Bush and Romney. The Republicans brought them here lol.


the republicans did 100% "bring them here", via produce picking jobs that paid 4$/hr cash and a demand for cash maids and cleaners. that's the economic side of immigration. But that's also not nearly as pertinent in 2019 as it was in 1999. In 2019 the immigration debate has a humanitarian facet with refugee migrants fleeing oppressive regimes and abject poverty. and we can all agree the right isn't drawing people up in 2019 for charity. plus there are plenty here already to do field work and low price service work such as cleaning and landscaping. so the right doesn't want more, even if they do turn out to be conservative republican voters.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll