d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Let's Talk About "fake News"
Prev12345636Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 2 2017 08:07am
Quote (Scaly @ Mar 2 2017 07:40am)
I didn't say it was. I said it was an example of the childish 'i know you are but what am I ' tactic the right, and especially Trump, is currently employing. A childish tactic that a huge amount of Americans fell for too. I don't know how many times and from how many different sources I heard 'They're as bad as eachother' during the campaign.


You didn't say it was? Could have fooled me.

Hillary vying to sell America downriver is equally as bad as anything Trump has done so far.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 2 2017 09:04am
Quote (IceMage @ 2 Mar 2017 14:11)
2 of those tweets are a defense of his travel hold, and one is just talking about Christian persecution. Of course he'll talk about the porous border, one of his central campaign promises was to secure the border.

If a bunch of Jews got shot up in their place of worship without a doubt Donald would comment/tweet on it. He's commented many times on the anti-Semitic acts, VP Pence got sent to the graveyard where it happened, and the only people who don't think that's enough are MSM/liberal types who have a preconceived notion that Trump won the election because he pandered to racists/anti-Semites. He literally just commented on the hateful actions yet you are here saying it's not enough. That's why you and others on this board can't be taken seriously to give Trump a fair shake, whatever he does will be twisted into something negative.


the reason for talking about (alleged) attacks doesn't change the fact that he did it. the point was not that he doesn't make sense to his shills, the point was that he only mentions brown ppl's terrorism. also, you obviously can't distinguish between speaking out when pressured to do so and doing it on your own, which was an important part of the argument.

that's why you can't be taken seriously to judge trump fairly because when in doubt, you'd just ignore half of the argument, dismiss the rest as somehow justified and then make up some fictionary scenario in which he WOULD have acted like a human being on his own initiative as "counter-argument", even though he had plenty of opportunities to condemn right wing terrorism and only did it when he was asked about it...

This post was edited by fender on Mar 2 2017 09:05am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 2 2017 10:45am
Quote (fender @ Mar 2 2017 10:04am)
the reason for talking about (alleged) attacks doesn't change the fact that he did it. the point was not that he doesn't make sense to his shills, the point was that he only mentions brown ppl's terrorism. also, you obviously can't distinguish between speaking out when pressured to do so and doing it on your own, which was an important part of the argument.

that's why you can't be taken seriously to judge trump fairly because when in doubt, you'd just ignore half of the argument, dismiss the rest as somehow justified and then make up some fictionary scenario in which he WOULD have acted like a human being on his own initiative as "counter-argument", even though he had plenty of opportunities to condemn right wing terrorism and only did it when he was asked about it...


We're not fighting a war on right-wing terror. We aren't spending hundreds of billions to take out right-wing terrorist networks. Trump has numerous reasons to remind people that Islamic terrorism is a big problem, whether it be his travel hold, his increase in defense spending, his desire to secure the border, etc. Frankly, a couple brown guys getting shot by an Islamaphobe/racist isn't that important. Trump has no reason to treat it as something special, because he's denounced hate and racism numerous times throughout his campaign/presidency.

If Trump is trying to appeal to racists or anti-Semites, or whoever, why did he open up his speech to congress addressing the recent incidents? He didn't have to do that, his administration already addressed them numerous times. His base wasn't going to abandon him for not denouncing hate for the millionth time.... only anti-Trump liberals and MSM folk care. If Trump acted like he had to denounce every instance of hate, he'd just be playing into the stupid narrative that the deplorables in his movement were behind it.

This post was edited by IceMage on Mar 2 2017 10:51am
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Mar 2 2017 10:51am
Quote (Santara @ 2 Mar 2017 14:07)
You didn't say it was? Could have fooled me.

Hillary vying to sell America downriver is equally as bad as anything Trump has done so far.


Obviously I did fool you. Or you fooled yourself.

Considering her charitable works and decades in natsec and diplomatic positions I really doubt she's 'vying to sell America downriver'. Her life's work has been protecting America and it's interests.

This post was edited by Scaly on Mar 2 2017 10:53am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 2 2017 11:12am
Quote (IceMage @ 2 Mar 2017 17:45)
We're not fighting a war on right-wing terror. We aren't spending hundreds of billions to take out right-wing terrorist networks. Trump has numerous reasons to remind people that Islamic terrorism is a big problem, whether it be his travel hold, his increase in defense spending, his desire to secure the border, etc. Frankly, a couple brown guys getting shot by an Islamaphobe/racist isn't that important. Trump has no reason to treat it as something special, because he's denounced hate and racism numerous times throughout his campaign/presidency.

If Trump is trying to appeal to racists or anti-Semites, or whoever, why did he open up his speech to congress addressing the recent incidents? He didn't have to do that, his administration already addressed them numerous times. His base wasn't going to abandon him for not denouncing hate for the millionth time.... only anti-Trump liberals and MSM folk care. If Trump acted like he had to denounce every instance of hate, he'd just be playing into the stupid narrative that the deplorables in his movement were behind it.


you see how you shifted from "he never mentions it" and "he WOULD speak out if such and such happened" to "he HAS to mention / remind people" and "a couple of brown guys getting shot isn't important", right?
because i do, nothing to add here really...
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 2 2017 11:31am
Quote (fender @ Mar 2 2017 12:12pm)
you see how you shifted from "he never mentions it" and "he WOULD speak out if such and such happened" to "he HAS to mention / remind people" and "a couple of brown guys getting shot isn't important", right?
because i do, nothing to add here really...


Well, the first reply I was focused on twitter, I missed the speech aspect. I wasn't wrong, on his twitter if you take out the tweets concerning the travel ban, he has only mentioned radical Islam a couple times. There's been a few serious terrorist attacks by ISIS in the ME since he got elected, he hasn't mentioned those. Are Canadian Muslims more important than Syrian or Pakistani Muslims?

This isn't a hard concept... there's a difference between people knocking over gravestones at a Jewish cemetery and a person shooting up a bunch of Jews in a synagogue. The president shouldn't respond to every act of hate, but he should respond to a serious incident like the latter. Why doesn't Trump speak out on mass shootings outside Chicago? Is he pandering to the racists who hate all blacks not in Chicago?

I'm just saying he has a lot of legitimate reasons to speak about radical Islam and remind people of it. Commenting on every hateful act doesn't make any sense. He doesn't play into the MSM narrative, he creates his own narrative.

This post was edited by IceMage on Mar 2 2017 11:42am
Member
Posts: 28,877
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Mar 2 2017 12:41pm
The amount of fake news being peddled by the MSM is disturbing. This, not phantom Russian interference is the real threat to our democracy.

Didn't vote for Trump in 2016 but if this continues i will gladly cast my vote for him in 2020
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Mar 2 2017 03:10pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 2 2017 11:41am)
The amount of fake news being peddled by the MSM is disturbing. This, not phantom Russian interference is the real threat to our democracy.

Didn't vote for Trump in 2016 but if this continues i will gladly cast my vote for him in 2020


ew
Member
Posts: 11,801
Joined: Nov 21 2008
Gold: 1,002.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 2 2017 03:46pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ 2 Mar 2017 19:41)
The amount of fake news being peddled by the MSM is disturbing. This, not phantom Russian interference is the real threat to our democracy.

Didn't vote for Trump in 2016 but if this continues i will gladly cast my vote for him in 2020


Voting for the one that couldn't clear the mess?

That's an interesting, counter productive resolve.
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Mar 2 2017 03:56pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 2 2017 11:41am)
The amount of fake news being peddled by the MSM is disturbing. This, not phantom Russian interference is the real threat to our democracy.

Didn't vote for Trump in 2016 but if this continues i will gladly cast my vote for him in 2020


Quote (Brian_D @ Mar 2 2017 02:10pm)
ew


It feels gross but I am starting to feel the same way. I mean, I have been at war with the Democratic party since the early 2000s, and I rarely vote for Democrats and instead throw my support to the Greens and various peace and socialism parties. But I may actually vote for a major party in 2020 and it won't be the Democrats if they keep this shit up. A message needs to be sent.

Also, I learned a lot about Brietbart recently. It was founded by a Jewish guy while on a birthright trip to Israel in order to put out news in defense of Jews and Israel. The owner of the publication is Jewish. I find it quite funny that anti-Israel leftists want to try painting Israeli Jews as anti-semitic. I don't know why Bannon hasn't been on the news bringing this fact up.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Mar 2 2017 03:59pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345636Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll