Quote (fender @ Mar 2 2017 10:04am)
the reason for talking about (alleged) attacks doesn't change the fact that he did it. the point was not that he doesn't make sense to his shills, the point was that he only mentions brown ppl's terrorism. also, you obviously can't distinguish between speaking out when pressured to do so and doing it on your own, which was an important part of the argument.
that's why you can't be taken seriously to judge trump fairly because when in doubt, you'd just ignore half of the argument, dismiss the rest as somehow justified and then make up some fictionary scenario in which he WOULD have acted like a human being on his own initiative as "counter-argument", even though he had plenty of opportunities to condemn right wing terrorism and only did it when he was asked about it...
We're not fighting a war on right-wing terror. We aren't spending hundreds of billions to take out right-wing terrorist networks. Trump has numerous reasons to remind people that Islamic terrorism is a big problem, whether it be his travel hold, his increase in defense spending, his desire to secure the border, etc. Frankly, a couple brown guys getting shot by an Islamaphobe/racist isn't that important. Trump has no reason to treat it as something special, because he's denounced hate and racism numerous times throughout his campaign/presidency.
If Trump is trying to appeal to racists or anti-Semites, or whoever, why did he open up his speech to congress addressing the recent incidents? He didn't have to do that, his administration already addressed them numerous times. His base wasn't going to abandon him for not denouncing hate for the millionth time.... only anti-Trump liberals and MSM folk care. If Trump acted like he had to denounce every instance of hate, he'd just be playing into the stupid narrative that the deplorables in his movement were behind it.
This post was edited by IceMage on Mar 2 2017 10:51am