Quote (zeratul87 @ 3 Apr 2011 15:40)
here's the gist of your response.
1. don't address any of the points that i made
2. post the results of googleing national dog associations. post home page and give me a fucking homework assignment (perhaps if you can make a point you should post up the direct link to it, this is supposed to be your argument afterall)
3. attempt to call into question my certification on the subject matter (biochemistry bs btw)
4. again attack my "apparent lack of knowledge" when you yourself were unable to adress the points that i made (or discern between them if you lack the cognitive graces to navigate a paragraph)
so you still comfy up there on your high chair? or do you feel it's necessary to address
1. phenotypes and heredity
2. environment and social infulences
3. relative inbreeding
4. the major underground chiuahaha fighting rings
then perhaps i'll address your moot point*. while you're at it post something other than a fucking home page noob
you said "/enddiscussion" so i did not discuss your points but only posted something which might enlighten you
and since you seemingly love googling: try for "dna testing of dangerous dog breeds" or similar, perhaps you find some interesting articles
yes, dna testing for dangerous breeds has been invented because it is only environmental factors which make them dangerous - your logic

you might also try for the uk act on dangerous breeds or similar from many other countries
and yes, i feel fine on my high chair on this issue (which in regard to my dog knowledge in comparison to you and some other posters here is justified)
This post was edited by brmv on Apr 3 2011 09:57am