Quote (Jazz_Thing @ Dec 9 2009 03:04pm)

You could buy an acoustic saxophone. Works just as legit.

edit: fuuu this makes me want to play mine

Quote (Dr_Lecter @ 9 Dec 2009 22:09)

but I can't get a dose of nicotine while playing jazz, can I?

Quote (Dr_Lecter @ Dec 9 2009 08:09pm)

but I can't get a dose of nicotine while playing jazz, can I?

Quote (general_patton @ Dec 9 2009 02:59pm)

http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat/

yeah, here's why I'm going to grow a small crop of cigar tobacco rather than buy the commercial shit.

I'm not interested in the equivalent of a few chest xrays every time I smoke a cigar.



yeah, she took the pedophile thing seriously, which was a victory on four chans behalf.

Quote

In 1982, tobacco researchers DiFranza and Winters concluded that smoking a pack and a half of cigarettes per day exposed a person to the same radiation as 300 chest x-rays per year(8). Due to improvements in X-ray technology and increasing levels of radionuclides in tobacco, the Institute of Medicine now estimates that a heavy smoker is exposed to the equivalent radiation as up to 2,000 chest X-rays every year(9). The National Institutes of Health state that tobacco is by far the largest source of radiation for the American public(10). Polonium is also present in chewing tobacco, benignly referred to as smokeless tobacco,

Quote (datajunky @ Dec 9 2009 03:37pm)

HOLY FUCKING SHIT.........



THAT IS SOME FUCKED UP SHIT RIGHT THERE

Quote (inkanddagger @ Dec 9 2009 01:48pm)

There is no conclusive evidence that smoking is harmful. In fact, smoking causes you to inhale more air, which is life sustaining. In fact, it can be said that smoking is actually a good thing for you because it brings more air into your lungs.

The amount of smoke inhaled into your lungs from a cigarettes is so much less than the total of regular air that you inhale throughout your life that the smoking is negligible. In fact, you inhale more smoke from natural causes than you ever would from cigarettes. See? Smoking cannot affect the natural cycle of breathing.

There have been documented instances of men during the middle ages smoking pipes and living to a ripe old age. Explain how that doesn't disprove that smoking causes lung cancer, Mr. Surgeon General.

The effects of smoking have been greatly exaggerated.

Liberal socialist communist overlords just want people to believe cigarettes can affect the natural breathing cycle in order to tax everyone and institute one world government.

The Surgeon General fails to warn you that non-smokers die every day. If smoking is so bad, then why are non-smokers dying? It's a natural cycle.

Believe it or not, nicotine is actually "a surprisingly potent drug for a variety of diseases that afflict the brain, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Tourette’s syndrome." You see, we need nicotine to live.

Cigarette butts are used by birds to make houses. Where would birds live and nest if everyone were to quit smoking? What do Marxist nonsmokers have against birds?

"Much of the debate ... is predicated on fear, rather than science." Calling smoking a bad thing in order to tax it is the "greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people," - James Inhofe

Quote (lone500 @ Dec 9 2009 09:07pm)

the way i see it tobacoo is bad for you.

not the tobacco itself though.

tobacco companies use radioactive bug sprays for pestcontrol.

now tobacco is a very absorbant plant. it leeches nutrients out of the soil like a mother fucker and its leaves absorb heavily from its surroundings too. so when you spray radioactive stuff on them of course they will absorb it.

then of course it comes to you in a cig.

its not the tobacco its the way its grown and processed.