Still not sure why anyone gives a shit about this nothing burger.

u know that when orange dude saying "the war in ukraine wouldnt even have started in the first place" if he got elected in 2020, then he right
all that shit with the laptop was all red flag regarding those shady ties
and not to forget, biden literally on stage bragging about blackmailing to fire the prosecutor and whatnot

the wars wouldnt have started with orange dude
There is not a single thing you could say that would make those wars "worth it" because "orange dude bad"

Like how stoopid people have become to actually be shills for wars...
Backward logic, clown world confirmed

Incorrect and you can't prove it. Yet the cheating that existed in 2020 for Biden was proven.

Imagine being deceased and still voting for democrats.
Imagine voting and not being the country.

Sheesh there were plenty of fake ballots in 2020.

purposely lying to the public at a critical juncture in an election window is basically fraud. Under current US law such actions, are not deemed illegal.

so in laymans terms:

If you were running for office (biden), and i was your subordinate (blinken), i am allowed, under current US law, to say that incriminating facts (the laptop) are not real. i am allowed to get 50 professionals to write an open letter that facts are not real, and I am allowed to trick the public into believing what I know to be a lie.
so, to bring this home, would you be of the same position if:
if you were running for office (trump), and i was your subordinate (whoever), i am allowed, under current US law, to say that incriminating facts (my involvement with putin) is not real. i am allowed to get 50 professionals to write an open letter that facts are not real, and I am allowed to trick the public into believing what I know to be a lie.

i tried to make this as simple as possible.

The only thing we know for a fact is that Blinken DID in fact do this, and there is no evidence to support the accusation against Trump.

incrimination of what?

In October 2020, shortly before the U.S. presidential election, the New York Post reported on materials allegedly found on Hunter Biden's laptop, suggesting potential conflicts of interest involving Joe Biden and foreign businesses. The Biden campaign denied wrongdoing, and some media outlets were cautious in reporting the story due to concerns about Russian interference. The laptop story was framed as possible disinformation by several former intelligence officials, and social media platforms limited its spread initially, which Republicans argued suppressed critical information for voters. Later investigations affirmed the laptop’s authenticity, fueling ongoing debate over the narrative and media’s role in covering politically sensitive information

its 1am here, im going to bed.

This post was edited by ferdia on Nov 1 2024 07:05pm

Name the crime, its not a crime to be involved in ukrainian corruption even if true.

That you think Democrats do little to no cheating makes you absolutely delusional and dishonest. They've already caught errors in Dominion machines in early voting, and states have been purging non-citizens and dead people and requiring Supreme Court backing to do so. This country is absolutely fucked and it's mostly the fault of people like you.

This post was edited by Thebarba on Nov 1 2024 08:19pm

Last i checked one of the worlds richest men lost in court for repeating this bullshit and it cost him billions, can you come up with some proof murdoch somehow missed?