You don't know how to hold a conversation do you?
I'm not reading past you protesting that propaganda films are indy movies, like its a fucking craft beer.

No arguments about global warming are remotely realistic, unless we look at temps over a much larger time period.
Even a few centuries is nothing on a planetary scale. We need to be looking at hundreds of thousands of years, rather than decades or centuries.

Every scientist in the world, KNOWS that weather is chaotic. Weather patterns don't follow normal mathematical models... at all.

Earth is 4,500,000,000 years old. The first modern homo sap only appeared 190,000 years ago.
If you do the math you'd see that homo sap (the entire time we've existed), could have come and gone... 23.684 times since this planet came to be.

Cow farts, human's industrial age, etc., are mere microseconds on the geologic clock.
Some would save it's unbridled hubris to assume that our total existence can have any affect on the weather.



Not to worry though, even if you do believe humanity is causing global warming, it won't matter.
We'll reach a food production threshold, long before we could affect the weather.

The way the population is growing, we'll starve long before we screw up the planet. :-)



Here's some LIVE statistics...

https://www.worldometers.info/

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 19 2024 05:52am

lol

When you take the temperature of the planet in a black top parking lot in the dead of summer.... It tends to be warmer.

Things also tend to be warmer if your name is Greta, and you were raised by liberal hippie-tards.

I can't stand that WEF shill, even seeing her face disgusts me.

It's not really her fault. She is/was developmentally challenged, and her parents brainwashed her from a very young age.
If there were any justice in the world, her parents would be up on child abuse charges.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 19 2024 06:31am

Yes, anthropogenic climate change is real. But the solutions proposed so far are all completely unacceptable and/or unworkable, for one reason or another.

Yes, we need to do something about climate change, but there's only two viable paths forward in my opinion:

1.) Dramatic technological breakthroughs with regard to storage technology and efficiency, so that a far-reaching electrification of society is actually viable.
2.) Geo-engineering.

In another 300 years, this topic might be relevant.

But for now, our limited data set is inconclusive, I would think?

It's really not my fault that you are ignorant.

The whole point of studying every "side" of the "climate change" debate is so that you can make an informed opinion on the subject and not just call everything "hocus pocus bullshit".

You aren't making an argument to debate what I've said. You are attacking what I say because you never did your due-diligence. Everything I've mentioned is backed by scientific theory and/or government patents?

What you are implying is that me watching 10+ documentaries on both sides of the "debate" makes me dumber then you because it's "biased" and I'm a "brainwashed idiot". You are just like the people on this sub forum who say "religion is bullshit!" but then when asked if you ever read any religious scripture/philosophy you say, "Haha religion is dumb I don't need to read that garbage!". You look like fools have never even taken the TIME to read into what you immediately denounce as "bullshit".





Well said but it's too bad international governments around the world have already deployed "geoengineering" with disastrous results. Just look up and witness the "solar radiation management"/"stratospheric aerosol injections". Deflected by the ignorant by saying the trigger word "Chemtrails". They've been dumping millions of tons of aluminum nanoparticulate for DECADES. These particulates have destroyed the soil microbiome. These particulates cause a myriad of health issues. Killed off a significant portion of insect populations. These particulate are an incendiary metal that causes wild fires to burn with a much greater intensity because the roof canopies of trees are saturated in these particulates. The list goes on and on and on. You can buy a simple "test kit" and take a water/soil sample and see it with your own eyes. People are lazy or don't give a fuck.

When Dane Wigginton called out Dr. David Keith the number one scientist on "geoengineering" who discussed the "low cost" of such a program when asked about what studies they'd done on the "safety" of introducing 'aluminum nanoparticulate' into the stratosphere he said, "We don't know what it would do but it could be absolutely terrible we never finished the studies"/ "It's sort of like free-riding on your grandkids".

The NOAA has a federal gag order on all federal employees so all "weathermen" and "climate scientist" can not even entertain the idea that "SAI" has been deployed. Major military contractors Raytheon and Lockheed Martin do all the weather modeling for the United States and are the ones who help the military to deploy SAI accurately.

So you are right that geoengineering can be done but it's already been done and the results like I said are "unavoidable". They've conditioned people around the world to deny what you can see with your own eyes.

New studies have shown how living in a "polluted city" can knock 10 years off your life but when someone mentions the dangers of "synergistic toxicity" associated with SAI everyone falls silent because it supposedly "isn't happening" despite their being a trove of scientific data proving it.

You literally have patented seeds that are aluminum resistant now because the entire planet is coated in this shit.

Bee populations suffering major declines.

"Oh we fixed the hole in the ozone layer nothing to see here!" As we punch holes in the atmosphere launching satellites.

The major reason I take such a hard stand on this subject is because it's literally killing the planet, the people I love, and the creatures we had no business making go extinct. People actually think if all the insects died we'd "get by". No we'd be dead. People think if the plankton in the ocean die we can get by. No we'd be dead.

We are about to experience what's called an "abrupt climate collapse" which is entirely different from "climate change" which happens gradually over time. How people can walk around in nature and not notice the deafening silence is beyond me.