Quote (MaysLanding @ Dec 19 2023 04:16am)
I'm not talking purely about the internet and how it functions. There are many spots in the USA that don't get service. My nice new Android device, 5g, yada yada, still won't get internet in those locations unless my PROVIDER provides a tower in that area. Again, back to the "does providing requires something to be in absence?" question.
But here we go...
I know that the only wireless piece of wireless is typically from the device to the tower.
At least 10 years ago, the USA DoD was deploying a mobile 4g network, using skunkworks to put up ptp links by Motorola in the Middle East. Without this network, many of the bases would have been internet blind. The radios were licensed broadband PtP radios with five 9's reliability and met all the FIPS and DoD requirements. Troops would not have had a network to use.
I have more experience in the wireless field as well, so if this doesn't pass the test, let me know.
But if we are talking about (1) ONE sat phone or something providing wifi to a bunch of devices in the middle of nowhere, I can't speak on that. But if that was a viable solution for unit movements, communications, etc, that becomes EXTREMELY expensive.
So, as advanced as the internet is, it still requires connection, restrict connection, no internet. And if the only real thing that is wireless is the device to the tower, that's possible to do.
Im thinking about what he said on a large scale. yes the internet requires a connection but there are myriad ways to connect - wirelessly as you pointed out(LTE, 4/5g, etc), satellite, then there are connections that depend on a physical connection such as dsl/cable/broadband/fiber.
lets use your example first
Quote
So, as advanced as the internet is, it still requires connection, restrict connection, no internet. And if the only real thing that is wireless is the device to the tower, that's possible to do.
how would Trump go about restricting a wireless connection where terrorists are? lets say in the USA. is he going to shut down ALL radio wave communication ? businesses rely on the internet, and so do air traffic controllers, nuclear power plants, our military and so on. or is he going to "restrict" the internet of bad guys only? how would he go about doing that? blocking Ip addresses? there are a million ways around a logical internet block
how would Trump go about restricting a wireless connection if the terrorists were located somewhere like Syria? he'd have to physically bomb their infrastructure and shoot down their VSAT satellites. do you think this is feasible?
logically blocking someone from using the internet is impossible, physically blocking someone from using the internet would involve a lot of military actions that would likely result in WW3. The internet is not something that can be "turned off"
look at this fiber cable mapping of the ME area. is Trump going to cut all of those cables sitting on the ocean floor?
This post was edited by gnarjay on Dec 19 2023 12:59pm