The HOUSE should be working on legislation, they aren't. The only reason the House/Dems are pursuing this, even after the Mueller report is that there were quite a few Dems involved in slightly or not legal shenanigans in the 2016 campaigns.

As for the rest...

Russia obviously wanted the weaker sovereign in power. Motivation is clear.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 24 2019 04:46pm

LOL. He already had someone he KNEW would do things he wanted for as little as a payoff.

How dare you make a joke

SHaMe!

Where's my fanfic?

“I was only joking when i unironically blamed the republican party for ‘sneaking in and forcing’ the electoral college on America, gosh you all are dense” -fender aka heinrich von goebbels

state subsidizes his rotten sauerkraut hot pockets my friend!

careful with the fanfics, i got 10% and 30 days for my one about chris and another fellow

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-trump-tweeted-a-misleading-video-of-nancy-pelosi-heres-the-real-thing

PBS running straight up disinformation and lies to smear Trump.
There were two different videos trending of Pelosi. One was on facebook, posted by some randos and got a few million views. It was slowed down by 25% and had its audio increased in frequency to compensate, which doctored the video to make it appear like Pelosi was slurring her words
The other video, posted by Trump on twitter, was simply a montage of Pelosi stumbling over words and stuttering. It did not have any deceptive edits, manipulation or otherwise misleading content. It was very clearly a collection of her stumbles from that speech.
Much of the media has falsely conflated the two videos to smear Trump, ironically accusing him of spreading disinformation by themselves spreading disinformation. But for PBS to join in the Pelosi defense squad is ridiculous

To claim its "misleading" or "manipulated", they point to the part in Trump's video where it pauses and repeats her "There were three things", three times, with a zoom effect, extremely obviously making a dramatic effect in normal video editing. Its not some deceptive edit that any rational human being could mistake as her actually saying the same thing three times in a row while her and the podium both somehow instantly grow in size.



Do they really think their readers are big enough morons that they can tell them exactly what part of the video to look at, that they would watch it and see that repetition and zoom, and somehow thing that video was intended to fool someone into thinking she said it four times in a row?
What's the thought process behind PBS here?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOQG1D7oa-A#t=12m40s

Right from /r/politic's shithole to PBS's articles

Pelosi held up 2 fingers and said “there are 3 things drumpf did wrong” or something to that effect. Apparently “public broadcasting” thinks this is photoshop lmfao

PBS is a joke. Should lose all their funding as they provide no public utility

I think they truly crossed the moral event horizon when they doxxed people for attending a right-wing rally
When your own government is doxxing private citizens in an attempt to destroy their careers, something is very wrong