So Hoover, Reagan, and Bush expanded the economy?

Incorrect again sir, they expanded the government. That is different.

Democratic presidents are better with the economy, and the economy is better when there is a Democratic president. This is an objective fact. And it isn't even close.

Here's a definitive book about it: http://www.amazon.com/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic/dp/1880026090

Those are by far the worst three, though Reagan has the consolation of cleaning the truly systemic mess left by Carter.

A lot of happenings within an economy arent visible until many years later too so it becomes a difficult argument to pin down. Ie: We wont fully understand the current unsustainable mess set up by the last three presidents for another ten years probably.

Reagan is the man we can thank for a lot of horrible things too though, no-fault divorce included. No idea why GOP gets such a hard on for him with those faulty judgments.

And people said he didnt have a plan, what cant they read?

I just love how Fiorina is in the running for worst CEO in modern history and is third in the GOP, then there's the Oreo put up every election to prove the party isn't racist, and the frontrunner who proves why the second guy is there.

No diversity in the Republican field? Party is racist. Diversity in the Republican field? Party is racist.



This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 15 2015 04:56pm

Asking anyone on the left to use logic or reason is a form of emotional abuse.

One token black guy, one token Hispanic, one Indian guy who wishes he was white. Not exactly diverse considering how many they've got up there, and considering the frontrunner is still trump I don't think we need to argue from lack of diversity in leadership the point that the party is racist.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 15 2015 05:04pm