d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev1289290291292293424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Nov 17 2021 05:13pm
this guy goes from defending a serial child rapist who died in the act of attacking a child...arguing the kid had no right to defend himself... right into 'but trump made a joke in 1992'

these leftists are sick in the head
Member
Posts: 7,600
Joined: Jan 29 2019
Gold: 14,145.95
Warn: 10%
Nov 17 2021 05:22pm
Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 17 2021 05:11pm)
You must've missed the part where I said "guilty or not"
Would have saved you that chapter you first responded with.


Poor justification for Rittenhouse's actions.

Quote (InsaneBobb @ Nov 17 2021 05:12pm)
This is a convicted pedophile who anally raped 5 boys from the ages of 9 to 11 that we're discussing.

If you wish to defend him, using unconfirmed accusations of politicians fucking consenting 16 year olds in states where 16 is the age of consent is a poor precedent.

You're in the wrong thread, friend. Kyle's case is not a political case. What's occurring right now is that a 17 year old is facing the real possibility of life without possibility of parole when based on the evidence, it seems clear he took the final actions required not to personally die.

Go watch my video and calm down, keyboard warrior.


What this man did was absolutely detestable. A legal system exists for this reason. The man's history has absolutely no meaning for this case. Rittenhouse travelled to another state and killed people. There need to be repercussions for his heinous actions. If there are not, this opens the door to this behavior being excused going forward.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Nov 17 2021 05:13pm)
this guy goes from defending a serial child rapist who died in the act of attacking a child...arguing the kid had no right to defend himself... right into 'but trump made a joke in 1992'

these leftists are sick in the head


How am I defending a serial child rapist?
Also, now Rittenhouse is a child? He's 17. Barely a toddler. He had no idea what he was doing.
But let's discuss him "defending himself". You show up to an event with a weapon that is entirely capable of murdering a dozen people within a minute and you expect to be met with zero hostility of any kind? He, like others who behave this way, escalate issues and create tension. You cannot create a hostile environment and then claim self-defense when you have been the aggressor.

The Trump reference is to make sure that people aren't just making this a purely left-right issue, which is of course happening. I just want people to keep consistent energy.
Member
Posts: 36,715
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
Nov 17 2021 05:26pm
Quote (Knarglegarth @ Nov 17 2021 05:22pm)
Poor justification for Rittenhouse's actions.



What this man did was absolutely detestable. A legal system exists for this reason. The man's history has absolutely no meaning for this case. Rittenhouse travelled to another state and killed people. There need to be repercussions for his heinous actions. If there are not, this opens the door to this behavior being excused going forward.



How am I defending a serial child rapist?
Also, now Rittenhouse is a child? He's 17. Barely a toddler. He had no idea what he was doing.
But let's discuss him "defending himself". You show up to an event with a weapon that is entirely capable of murdering a dozen people within a minute and you expect to be met with zero hostility of any kind? He, like others who behave this way, escalate issues and create tension. You cannot create a hostile environment and then claim self-defense when you have been the aggressor.

The Trump reference is to make sure that people aren't just making this a purely left-right issue, which is of course happening. I just want people to keep consistent energy.


You've brought politics in this and have tried to bait me into them thinking I'm some right wing vigilant who's gonna defend any of those people you stated.
It's real fuckin' simple...
I have no sympathy for child molesters.
It's concerning that you do.

This post was edited by lolkggz on Nov 17 2021 05:46pm
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Nov 17 2021 05:47pm
Quote (Knarglegarth @ Nov 17 2021 03:22pm)
basically


"Yeah the guy was a pedo and that's kinda bad but KYLE CROSS STATE LINES! CROSSED. STATE. LINES."
Member
Posts: 24,039
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Nov 17 2021 06:07pm
Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 17 2021 05:09pm)
You don't need to type all of it.
When I say hang all of them to stop having them procreate by fucking up the innocence of kids early.
I mean hang them all, I don't care who they are.


:hail:
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Nov 17 2021 06:11pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 17 2021 04:30pm)
The idea that if you point a weapon at someone, they then chase u down, try and attack you, and you shoot them with the gun you pointed at them, after running away from the person you supposedly pointed a gun at for several hundred feet, you're then guilty of murder, was always a silly argument to make.

the issue is the defense cant walk out that hypothetical, because it puts in the jury's mind that Kyle did point a gun at people, which by all evidence except yellowpant's video testimony, he didn't.

if someone points a gun at me, i put my hands up, they turn to walk away, i chase them a football field or so distance, into a corner, and they shoot me. i deserved to die, and they deserve AT MOST to be charged with brandishing a weapon. which of course wasnt charged, because there's zero evidence it happened, and pedo is dead, OH YA and druggie #1 and #2 are not testifying, for "reasons". zisshitsky could have taken the stand and said under oath kyle pointed a gun at them. the guy closest to the shooting wont say shit, or wasnt asked to.


Such a fucking waste of time. China would ignore this and send the pedophiles into a concentration camp.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Nov 17 2021 06:11pm
Member
Posts: 40,879
Joined: Feb 8 2009
Gold: 13,500.00
Nov 17 2021 06:31pm
Quote (Knarglegarth @ Nov 17 2021 05:22pm)


But let's discuss him "defending himself". You show up to an event with a weapon that is entirely capable of murdering a dozen people within a minute and you expect to be met with zero hostility of any kind? He, like others who behave this way, escalate issues and create tension. You cannot create a hostile environment and then claim self-defense when you have been the aggressor.


I would love to discuss his right to defend himself. Let's take some things you said and look at them honestly.

"You show up to an event with a weapon" - He did travel to the riots (burning, looting, etc.), which you labeled as an event, as if it's some fun party, he got the weapon from a friend in Kenosha (he didn't take the gun across state lines like previously reported), where his father lives and also where he works. He travelled 21 miles to get there (Gauge travelled 51 miles), I don't think how long it takes you to get somewhere is relevant in this case or if you went to a different state btw. Yes weapons (guns more than most others) can kill people and can do it quickly, but don't forget that the rioters also had weapons (guns, chains, slabs of concrete, etc.) and one of them even aimed their handgun at Kyle.

"He, like others who behave this way, escalate issues and create tension" - How did he behave? Video evidence shows he was there and applying basic first aid (known from being a lifeguard most likely) and also putting out fires. The reality is the tension was already high before he got their based the video evidence of rioting and physical evidence of the aftermath of the riots. The rioters, we are told, are doing this based on the information that they have heard, or maybe not heard regarding the shooting of Jacob Blake. To simplify, they were already angry, committing crimes, and opposing anyone in their way.

"You cannot create a hostile environment and then claim self-defense when you have been the aggressor. " -I have already established that he didn't create a hostile environment, it was already hostile. The rioters didn't like that he was stopping what they were doing and tried to stop him from doing it. He was not the aggressor at all, in the video evidence he is clearly running away from the rioters toward the police and telling people he is going to get help. Meanwhile a bunch of people start yelling that he shot someone and he needs to be "curbed." He is then attacked, someone tries to take his gun from him, then someone else pulls a handgun on him. He did not shoot anyone that did not pose an immediate threat to his own well-being.

100% self defense.

Member
Posts: 435
Joined: Jan 26 2009
Gold: 6,001.00
Nov 17 2021 06:34pm
Liberals, conservatives

Gentiles are so funny.

Foolish mortals your petty quarrels only make me stronger.
Member
Posts: 27,157
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Nov 17 2021 06:37pm
Quote (Grekko @ 17 Nov 2021 17:09)
I don't know what that video proves, I have no idea what is going on there.


its fine you dont have to understand that doesnt mean anything

Quote (Grekko @ 17 Nov 2021 19:31)
I would love to discuss his right to defend himself. Let's take some things you said and look at them honestly.

"You show up to an event with a weapon" - He did travel to the riots (burning, looting, etc.), which you labeled as an event, as if it's some fun party, he got the weapon from a friend in Kenosha (he didn't take the gun across state lines like previously reported), where his father lives and also where he works. He travelled 21 miles to get there (Gauge travelled 51 miles), I don't think how long it takes you to get somewhere is relevant in this case or if you went to a different state btw. Yes weapons (guns more than most others) can kill people and can do it quickly, but don't forget that the rioters also had weapons (guns, chains, slabs of concrete, etc.) and one of them even aimed their handgun at Kyle.

"He, like others who behave this way, escalate issues and create tension" - How did he behave? Video evidence shows he was there and applying basic first aid (known from being a lifeguard most likely) and also putting out fires. The reality is the tension was already high before he got their based the video evidence of rioting and physical evidence of the aftermath of the riots. The rioters, we are told, are doing this based on the information that they have heard, or maybe not heard regarding the shooting of Jacob Blake. To simplify, they were already angry, committing crimes, and opposing anyone in their way.

"You cannot create a hostile environment and then claim self-defense when you have been the aggressor. " -I have already established that he didn't create a hostile environment, it was already hostile. The rioters didn't like that he was stopping what they were doing and tried to stop him from doing it. He was not the aggressor at all, in the video evidence he is clearly running away from the rioters toward the police and telling people he is going to get help. Meanwhile a bunch of people start yelling that he shot someone and he needs to be "curbed." He is then attacked, someone tries to take his gun from him, then someone else pulls a handgun on him. He did not shoot anyone that did not pose an immediate threat to his own well-being.

100% self defense.


Dude showed up with a gun lying about being a medic and defending property he then murdered two people.

guilty

This post was edited by Crunkt on Nov 17 2021 06:38pm
Member
Posts: 40,879
Joined: Feb 8 2009
Gold: 13,500.00
Nov 17 2021 06:40pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Nov 17 2021 06:37pm)
its fine you dont have to understand that doesnt mean anything


You didn't explain it when you posted it though, so that's weird. It's ok, someone quoted you and informed me what was going on. You also never replied to the person who quoted you and discredited the video.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1289290291292293424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll