So? What should that crap mean now? Was it no snake then? Was it a human being or a 4-legged snake? God obviously didnt take the limbs of humans away, so this is pretty contradicting. Looks like you are just talking random shit out of your ass to somehow make sense of the incredible nonsense you call evidence for god's existence.

This post was edited by Modulok2405 on Mar 27 2022 01:29pm

scripture suggests heaven (alternate dimension) has diversity in its population.

Matthew 18:18
“Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
(as above so below? heaven and earth are connected.)

snake
2. a treacherous or deceitful person.

snake can refer to a person or persona...........a being
actual snakes (on the belly) is the link that connects to two realms (dimensions)

"to somehow make sense of the incredible nonsense you call evidence for god's existence"
(nope, I am just showing a itty bitty part that shows the accuracy of scripture. snake used to have legs and it was first heard in scripture. and your dodging and making a bich fest out of it cause you cant give up a lil teeny weeeny tiny lil bit, that is the part that prove God the most (your spiritual inability to give a little because its scripture) and this also exposes you and your true motive. your just here to mock n scoff n wiggle your ears. It would of been so much easier if you said lucky guess and moved on but you couldnt do it that way could you.)

(i have moved on quite a while ago. I am now exposing antitheist world view and how false it is. you came after my belief I have defended it now you defend your belief.)

Yeah, sure buddy :-D I dont have a belief, so there is nothing I have to defend.

About your incredibly meaningless scripture evidence here: I wont tell you for the fifth time why the snake-argument is an absolute invalid pile of crap, i feel like talking to a toddler, so I wont bother anymore.
Keep pulling new ways to explain the obvious fairy tale stories out of your ass by adding new supernatural, unverifiable and undemonstrable "facts", its okay.

The sad part is that religious people won't take the L after they die, because there is no way to ever realize you were wrong because of the nothingness that follows life...but what can you do...

This post was edited by Modulok2405 on Mar 27 2022 05:06pm

90 iq: because they have been raised in religious families

120 iq: they generally dont

150 iq: because the only viable alternative (multiple universes, due to fine tuning argument) is also counterintuitive and has absolutely zero proof, while the god theory actually has some evidence, although circumstantial

You must not enjoy being an atheist.

It's good you are getting interested in God.

depends which god.

never believe in the pedophile false prophet from the religion of feces.

Just goes to show you the power of the Gospel and how it is still going strong 2022 Years later.

Define god

you dont have a belief. antitheists used to have beliefs till they all got destroyed by science. now they weasel out by saying "no" belief or "lack of belief" its so cheesy how unscientific the atheist/antitheist is. you "dont have a belief" but you "believe" you are going to start a thread and really show them christians, so far its been a fail hasnt it. you should be careful about what you believe.

you ever hear of the "simulation hypothesis" it appears science is having trouble explaining the construct/ "material world"/ universe. if this is true it means it is a created place. science is the worst enemy of the atheist/antitheist. while the antitheist mocks n scoffs and wiggles their ears with endless excuses.

i agree with this.. i mean sure, one can say that hes an agnostic and remove himself from the debate. i dont know, i dont wanna get involved. fine. but atheism is a completely different thing because people dont seem to understand that a negative statement, unlike lack of statement, does have its consequences. science (and common logic) states that its either creationism or parallel universes. so atheism is pretty much like two people flipping a coin, where the creationist says "its gonna be heads", and the atheist is like "naah, no way its gonna be heads"; "so its gonna be tails you mean?"; "im not saying its gonna be tails, just that no way its heads"; "umm yes you kinda are"; and this is usually where the debate turns into pure semantics without anything new being said. so what a smart atheist should do is, 1) realize you arent above the debate, but a part of it, and 2) try to hold your position but without ignoring science. atheism is like farting in a room and running out so other people smell your fart while you are on safe distance

oh and the worst part is atheists saying how they are unbiased. and then they come up with the "simulation theory", which is not only creationist by nature, but doesnt even explain anything about the nature of the universe as unlike the god theory, something had to create the simulator etc. basically atheists are now accepting and even literally cheering the weakest and most useless of creationist theories