Lmao, you pick out one sentence out of the whole paper, ignoring what they still conclude even with that result, and you accuse ME of cherry picking...? oh man, that's rich. Thanks for the laugh.

Do you even know what a conclusion is...?







If the virus were airborne you'd have a point. But it's not, it's treated as a droplet precaution, which is very different. The virus isn't going anywhere unless it's carried by a droplet, and those are much larger than the pores.

He thinks norovirus is a bacteria, so what do you expect? He probably can't even read himself.

its a measurement that wasnt covered in "conclusion". the measurements are covered in the paper itself however. It is only subjective reasoning lying to one self that it doesnt count.

you mask zombies think a droplet is a solid. it will go through the mask like water through a straw carrying the cootie with it

eat it laughing boy
CO2levels increased significantly compared with baseline measures, especially when comparing anN95 with a surgical mask to only an N95....
CO2levels increased significantly compared with baseline measures, especially when comparing anN95 with a surgical mask to only an N95....
CO2levels increased significantly compared with baseline measures, especially when comparing anN95 with a surgical mask to only an N95....
CO2levels increased significantly compared with baseline measures, especially when comparing anN95 with a surgical mask to only an N95....

whay a candy azz straw man. your so helpless you cant find the size of a bacteria

Go try to pour water through a mask. Funny thing, the mask tends to just absorb the water.

Wow you're so stupid you think a norovirus is a bacteria and you think cloth can't get damp.

Gotta say this is exactly the level of thought I expect from you.

To be fair, your response has nothing to do with his post.

He wasn't referring to H20 going through masks. He was referring to viruses, which are much smaller than water and carried in aerosolized vaper that you exhale.

Then he referred to CO2 levels in the blood stream increasing due to mask usage, which can be dangerous.

Your water example is purely meaningless.

no it doesnt it beads up, mask must be treated with a water repellent most likely so it doesnt get soggy. ya see you made that up also but i have already tested masks for that. because your a mask zombie that believes what your told i distrust lying government and it has to be proven to me. whos the scientific one.........not u

why i have all the links to verify what i am talking about and you just have your demands

"Wow you're so stupid you think a norovirus is a bacteria and you think cloth can't get damp."
(thats your straw man you are still trying to push. straw manning means you lost the argument and are reverting to dishonest tactics.)
you have some nerve to call others a liar

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 16 2021 09:24pm

they think that water in a droplet turns into a solid, they are magic believers.
new england journal of medicine masks are a talisman. If you look up talisman it says magic device they are magic believers

i imagine your mask is all old and worn out and the water treatment is worn out so it is probably like a dirty old dish rag your breathing through

Except it isn't, because water attaches to the mask when it comes in contact. Viruses don't travel in water vapor, they travel in droplets, which are much larger.

We've pointed this out to him about 10 times but he refuses to learn All lizard brain, which is why he insisted that hospitals only use masks for bacteria even though they use them for diseases that have virus right there in the name.