d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Youtube Video Thread
Prev12829303132716Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,322
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.77
Jul 25 2016 04:29pm
Quote (balrog66 @ 25 Jul 2016 02:03)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7e6gLht6OQ

:rofl:

The Youtube comments are even worse than ParD



Yes, the voice of the people sure is awful huh?
stick with your elitist article worship
Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Jul 26 2016 10:56am

Imagine that.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jul 26 2016 11:10am
that nice piece at 0.25

Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Jul 26 2016 11:32am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jul 26 2016 05:10pm)
that nice piece at 0.25

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbqw-yCdhNM


With a down vote ratio of nearly 7:1 it would seem that consensus disagrees.
Why is it the racist democrats are always race baiting? Hmm maybe as a party dems depend on racism as political capital. Makes ya think don't it?
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jul 26 2016 11:53am
Quote (TradeBot @ 26 Jul 2016 18:32)
With a down vote ratio of nearly 7:1 it would seem that consensus disagrees.
Why is it the racist democrats are always race baiting? Hmm maybe as a party dems depend on racism as political capital. Makes ya think don't it?


the video is bad, im pretty agree with that, just that hoe was pretty
Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Jul 26 2016 12:21pm

http://www.biography.com/people/angela-merkel-9406424

Remind you of anyone?

This post was edited by TradeBot on Jul 26 2016 12:50pm
Member
Posts: 14,554
Joined: Jan 4 2007
Gold: 109.01
Jul 26 2016 12:47pm
Quote (TradeBot @ Jul 26 2016 11:56am)


this is dumb, and I'm probably one of the more vocal folks on saying islam is a terrible ideology, but the idea's expressed in that vid are untenable.

It calls for the state to pick and choose religions and ban people from practicing their faith. As much as I think islam sucks, I think people are entitled to believe in whatever wacky shit floats their boat providing they are not trespassing another.
When you persecute a minorities religion it has the opposite effect of making them more reasonable, they then are justified in lashing out against this oppression, many will use violence.
It calls for the state to decide how free adults can come together into relationships of their choosing, and how many kids they can have.
If the video had what it wanted and there was no more islam, I still dont see it impacting welfare/social benefits. When you subsidize something with handouts and free-rides you get more of it, thats human nature, religion doesnt change this equation.
Some of the terrorism that has taken place isnt because of Islamic fundamentalism but rather a direct respone for some of the western worlds geopolitics and blowback for miltary actions for corporate profits and hegemony (ie the gold dinar and libya).
People would still likely be largely manipulated by fear even if Islam did not exist, that's how the sheeple are prodded, there would just be a different boogyman. "Hegelian dialectic" in action.

Halal is inhumane compared to the western method of captive bolt slaughter, at least for larger animals.

This post was edited by Master_Zappy on Jul 26 2016 12:52pm
Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Jul 26 2016 12:51pm
Member
Posts: 4,783
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 68.99
Warn: 10%
Jul 26 2016 12:51pm
Quote (Master_Zappy @ Jul 26 2016 09:47pm)
"Hegelian dialectic" in action.

wtf lol :rofl:
What exactly is it that you're referring to when talking about Hegel and dialectics?

This post was edited by Gastly on Jul 26 2016 12:53pm
Member
Posts: 14,554
Joined: Jan 4 2007
Gold: 109.01
Jul 26 2016 12:58pm
Quote (Gastly @ Jul 26 2016 01:51pm)
wtf lol :rofl:


The sentence on manipulation by fear tactics.

I know you're a philosophy buff so correct me if I have it wrong, but surely either creating a problem, or focusing/exaggerating the scope on it excessively to then sway public opinion for the goals of state seem pretty clear cut in my eyes. The Patriot act , the first assualt rifle ban, WMD's, tranny's in bathrooms, or mentioning terror 9/11 in every other sentence by out govt leadership to gin up support for elections and policy. (more of a post 9/11 thing then recently)


Quote
The Hegelian Dialectic is, in short, the critical process by which the ruling elite create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus conditioning the people that a change is needed. When the population is properly conditioned, the desired agenda of the ruling elite is presented as the solution. The solution isn't intended to solve the problem, but rather to serve as the basis for a new problem or exacerbate the existing one.

When the newly inflamed difficulty reaches the boiling point of a crisis, it becomes the foundation upon which arguments may again be made for change. Hence, the process is repeated, over and over, moving society toward whatever end the planners have in mind.

It's also important to understand that as this process is being driven, arguments are created both for and against certain measures of change. All arguments are controlled. The presented solutions — each with varying levels of unadornment — are "debated" publicly by the manipulators or their minions. This is done until a perceived compromise has been reached on the best measure to take in route to solving the crisis. Then, the outcome of the "debate" — which purportedly weighs the concerns of the public with the mandate to do something — is enacted as public policy.


This post was edited by Master_Zappy on Jul 26 2016 01:02pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12829303132716Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll