It's like Marco Roboto in forum format "im right your wrong you just dont understand!!!!!!!"

Recognizing that it was physically possible and in fact likely for certain events to happen paired with your mere assertion that i don't understand "elementary concepts" do not demonstrate that I don't understand them, nor would that make you any less horrendously wrong.

I didn't have magic powers and pull my observations out of thin air or just happen to get lucky that the republicans won in dominating fashion outside of your "range of all likely outcomes".
I cited polls and numerous models and warned you exactly what you were doing wrong. Instead of recognizing this you stomped your feet and acted like a complete tool. Now even after you were proven to be horrendously wrong, you still look back at it and celebrate your supposed exceptional accuracy and continue to act like a fool. Its shameful.

Debating over whether the peculiar Kansas race going to the independent would be indicative of a universal swing, and whether it would completely decide the senate majority or not is NOT the same thing as "being oblivious" of universal swings.

Haha Clinton would get destroyed by trump

in what? a cagematch? i'd pay to see that

I'm pretty sure a professional athlete would crush Trump.
#Clinton-Dix4prez

I hear Monica Lewinsky is a huge Packers fan coz she loves Clinton-Dix.

Seeing the faux-outrage over the tarmac meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton reminds me of the scenario I was asked to lay out several months ago involving how Clinton could be innocent on the merits yet still could get indicted (and even convicted) anyway. This pretty much fits it: now the DOJ is being pressured into accepting the FBI's recommendation regardless of merit.

In campaign news, the first Clinton-Obama rally will be on Tuesday in Charlotte NC: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/30/us/politics/obama-clinton-campaign.html?_r=0

That says a whole lot. Priorities USA added PA to their slate last week with a $10.5 mil ad buy and Clinton's campaign is going to start a targeted ad buy there soon too, and it's allowing them to get even more aggressive in NC. The fact that they're having Obama's first appearance come in NC speaks volumes. The RNC's polling had Trump trailing there a month ago and I'm guessing it must not have gotten any better during his struggles this month, especially while NC has been seeing Clinton/Priorities' ads.



I appreciate the laugh don't get me wrong, but him unintentionally preserving the evidence that completely undermines his claim and presenting it settles the matter.

It's not the fifth indication that I've made regarding comprehension, it's the fifth time I've refused to allow you to frame the discussion with your own narrative. Never assume that my refusal to engage you on your terms means an inability to do so. That's a pretty standard shortcoming on your part.

Again, 9 is less than or greater than 13? Baby steps, son.

It is. You're doing exactly what I said you were going to do to the letter, not like that took any bold foresight on my part. Your first post was a misrepresentation and you continued to do it as you dug deeper to try to divert attention away from your backfire. I obviously have no interest in indulging those. I know you can't help but to try projection but don't waste your time on any of your other overused ploys. I've got no appetite for misrepresentations, there's no need to bother pretending you're offering anything other than that.

Awww, you think we're being unfair in pointing out your errors?

You don't get to frame the discussion with me, son. You might be able to pull the wool over other people's eyes, but not me.