I don't lol

I'm saying so for the sake of this argument.

I'd like to hear in what way they aren't, based on the reasons one has to do the actions, and the consequences of the actions.

I'm sure you can find an arbitrarily simple point at which 2 different actions are morally equivalent, like shooting someone in the head with a gun and instantly killing them, and shooting someone in the head with a different model of gun and instantly killing them.

most (morbidly)fat people seem impervious to the shaming anyways

disgusting creatures

...you made the positive claim , it is incumbent upon you to tell us why they are equivalent with something other than poor analogies .

They're not, because one will always involve more suffering than the other.

This post was edited by Neptunus on Mar 21 2016 04:32pm

Since when do rules of logic apply to you?

So you're saying seeking palate pleasure and torturing animals aren't equivalent. Of course, I agree with that. I'm referring specifically to palate pleasure obtained through torturing animals.

...oh look it's you , I was wondering where my newest ankle biter was hiding .

...like the untold thousands upon thousands of rabbits and squirrels and gophers maimed or sliced to ribbons by harvesting machines ?

Oh look at you, gone from pretense to gossip monger.