Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 12 2023 02:56pm)
She had lawyers who took the fall and said they scrubbed it of their own volition. The fact Trump opined about that is unironically cited in the indictment as evidence against him, which leads to the extra delicious layer of unintentional irony by the prosecution and their double standard. They want to argue Trump is a criminal for merely discussing a parallel to a case they argued wasn't criminal
evidence =/= criminality.
he's not a criminal MERELY for talking about HRC, he's an alleged criminal for being physically in possession of classified material he was told to return.
possession is after all nine tenths of the law. he had that thang on him.