Studies shows it's peanuts, the only thing to take care of is to not put them right in a natural reserve.

btw you can try electrocuted birds too... Have fun.

of course not, and of course it's silly to suggest that wind turbines cause cancer.

nonetheless, wind turbines also have their ecological downsides, and since you were posting dramatic, emotionally suggestive pics of birds suffering the consequences of fossil fuels, it was only fair to point out that similar harm to the wildlife can be caused by wind turbines.

fender is a strong believer, he doesnt care about billions of dead birds and insects getting shredded for an extremely expensive, unreliable and ineffective way to produce energy

always remember, there is good and evil destruction of our environment
cut down trees and kill birds for fossil fuel = worst thing ever
cut down trees and kill birds for wind energy = zero fucks given

without a doubt, but no one is claiming they don't.



so pointing out the consequences of energy that trump NEVER criticises as a (semi-serious) reply to a post about him making absolutely retarded claims and suggestions about wind turbines is 'emotionally suggestive', and it's 'fair' to reply to it with false equivalence? sounds a bit biased...



more false equivalence from science deniers, what a surprise...

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/437481-wikileaks-assange-will-be-expelled-from-ecuadorian-embassy-within?__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

this is like the 5th or 6th time we've heard that Julian Assange is about to be ousted from the Ecuadorian embassy
but this time it sounds like its for realsies

why? i havent seen birds and insects getting killed to a worrying degree by fossil fuel here
have you?

1 minute of using this site called google will give you plenty of usually pro renewable people complaining about the problem
but hey, it wouldnt be a fender post without one out of fossil fuel conspiracy theories, nazi nazi nazi shouts or science denier

as i said, you are a true believer and using that retarded vocabulary actually results in the joke being on you
a scientific assistant with a degree becomes a science denier by asking simple and unsolved questions as well as pointing out false terminology to manipulate public opinion, that comes from the guy who doesnt even know what temperature is

you are on the intellectual level of the catholic church
900 years ago

not sure if joking or just completely braindead... you haven't seen it with your own eyes so it doesn't exist? is that seriously your 'logic' here? do i have to link you lists of oil and coal catastrophes for you to accept something that should be incredibly basic knowledge for every human being?!

anyway, where is the 'conspiracy theory' here? the fact that fossil fuel had / has / and will have horrendous consequences for our environment? are you really that brainwashed? get out of here with your utterly moronic false equivalences, you science and fact denying hack...

someone who (despite having been provided with multiple sources several times) isn't even aware of how much money the fossil fuel industry spent to keep the public misinformed and undermine climate research ironically talks about 'conspiracy theories' - all while peddling his pro fossil fuel propaganda - the pinnacle of hypocrisy right there...

This post was edited by fender on Apr 4 2019 06:57pm

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/04/politics/michael-cohen-letter/index.html



Someone step on this worm, please.

how convenient

what a spineless, pitiful creature...