Quote (ChrisKz @ 29 Mar 2019 05:16)
No, I just find it funny how you are so fucking blind. Do you really think the U.S 'loses' in engagements? It is more like the morality of our military and the laws of war that make us 'lose' on foreign soil.
It is so funny every time I see some low level minded person purposely exclude different avenues of logic to further their half-baked points.
could you quickly remind me of the morality of napalm, agent orange, civilian massacres, a false flag incident that lead to 3 million dead people, and how you didn't lose engagements in vietnam?
holy mother of delusion...
then tell me about the morality of bombing hospitals, drone warfare, depleted uranium ammunition, shooting down civilian aircraft, taking out democratically elected leaders, invading countries based on lies and war propaganda (
'they take babies out of incubators and throw them on the floor / they have wmds / they shelter terrorists...') and destabilising a whole region, leading to the death of millions of people - to secure drilling rights and access to natural resources...
how gullible do you have to be to believe that hollywood fairytale of moral americans fighting for the good in the world - that unfortunately ended in 1945...
that being said, the 'we need our guns to fight against oppressive government' excuse is still as blatantly retarded as it always was. especially considering that the vast majority of owned guns belong to the very cucks that support oppressive government - against minorities predominantly, but also against themselves. they are the scared and fragile people who always vote for security over liberty, and then sheepishly regurgitate the propaganda that suggests the only liberty actually worth having is being able to play with deadly weapons and occasionally shoot up some place...