Quote (CPK001 @ 30 Aug 2023 05:57)
Which brings me to you. You don't really give God any chance do you?
Wrong. I give every god every chance every day and have done so for getting on 50 years. Not one god has ever given me any reason to believe. I still await the opportunity to believe in a god, but none appears.
Quote (CPK001 @ 30 Aug 2023 05:57)
No matter what the example or explanation is, you simply cannot comprehend that the answer can ever be God. What if God simply wanted to remain anonymous? That would certainly explain the definition of coincidence.
I can comprehend just fine. There's simply no evidence to support it.
That's fine, gods prerogative. But that means god doesn't want me to believe in him. Anything that truly fits your definition of a god must know that I am not capable of believing in that which is unbelievable. If god wants my belief then I need something. And no, you don't fit the criteria. People lie, people make mistakes, people have hallucinations. The word of people is not evidence or the slightest bit convincing.
Quote (CPK001 @ 30 Aug 2023 05:57)
Why do you also have this mindset that if something can be explained by Science then it can't possibly be God?
I don't. If you'd been paying any attention to my posts instead of thinking you're better than me just because you've been on this site longer in your very unchristian arrogance you'd realize I've stated multiple times that science has no issues with religion unless or until religion pretends to be science. I have no issues with god taking 14 billion years a big bang and evolution to get us here. I'm not a god so I can't critique the methodology. It's outside my purview. I don't think a god is necessary, but there's no evidence to discuss either way so I don't particularly care if you want to replace question marks with god. Just don't expect me to follow suit.
Quote (CPK001 @ 30 Aug 2023 05:57)
In Genesis we read how God created the Heavens and the Earth, which is how it was all designed. Just like how you cannot examine the ins and outs of how the lightbulb works to find out more about Thomas Edison - you'd have to read the books on Thomas Edison.
You have to trust the books were written by Edison or a contemporary of Edison to believe them. If I write a book about Edison and say he was resurrected and died for our sins noone (hopefully) will believe it because I didn't know Edison or anyone who knew Edison and I wasn't even born when Edison was alive. Also resurrection is impossible and has never happened.
Replace Edison with jesus because that's the exact situation. Decades after the mythological jesus died is the first mention of jesus. And then suddenly this person noone ever knew was performing miracles and resurrecting. Yeah I'm going to want video evidence of this shit not the word of untrustworthy people who never even knew the guy.
Quote (CPK001 @ 30 Aug 2023 05:57)
Same where in order to find out more about God, you don't rely on Science to explain the how everything works - you read the word of God to find out more about him.
Your quest for Science being superior is completely meaningless.
It would be if I was on such a quest because science and religion don't have a crossover. Science is proven superior for understanding the universe mechanically, but understanding the universe mechanically isn't religion's purpose so it doesn't matter. Of course math is better at figuring out geometry than grammar. Each tool to it's own use.
I read the word of the christian god and it's the word of a narcissistic asshole. Fortunately I'm willing to accept the probability that the people who wrote about him messed it up and the people who compiled the writings also messed up. Unfortunately god never commissioned a rewrite.