d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1281928202821282228233169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Mar 6 2019 06:59pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Mar 6 2019 04:12pm)
Officials will no longer be required to publicly disclose the number of civilians killed in airstrikes against terrorist targets due to a new executive order from President Trump https://cnn.it/2C7ZrOy

odd rule change


That is a misrepresentation. One executive order cancelled out another. Obama's order required that civilian deaths had to be reported, even if nobody asked. The other said, "That's bullshit." The first said that every airstrike had to find out exactly how many civilians were harmed, even if it was zero, the resources had to be expended to find out that number for sure. Then it had to be publicly recorded. That is a huge waste of resources. So while it may seem great for transparency, Trump's "that's bullshit" undoing of it is just fine, in my book. I don't care. If a couple people die in foreign nations so that a jihadist cell is eliminated, whatever. I can FOIA that shit later to determine if they committed crimes against humanity or not.
Member
Posts: 50,916
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 6 2019 07:04pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Mar 6 2019 06:59pm)
That is a misrepresentation. One executive order cancelled out another. Obama's order required that civilian deaths had to be reported, even if nobody asked. The other said, "That's bullshit." The first said that every airstrike had to find out exactly how many civilians were harmed, even if it was zero, the resources had to be expended to find out that number for sure. Then it had to be publicly recorded. That is a huge waste of resources. So while it may seem great for transparency, Trump's "that's bullshit" undoing of it is just fine, in my book. I don't care. If a couple people die in foreign nations so that a jihadist cell is eliminated, whatever. I can FOIA that shit later to determine if they committed crimes against humanity or not.


It was a nice EO and I would have preferred the transparency. I think you overstate the burden of compliance, and its right to criticize Trump for it. I think we should be rationalizing the costs and benefits on their face values. Its easy for people to scream their bleeding hearts about dead civilians and hard to rationalize the difficult pragmatic choice to engage on limited intel and collateral risks. But it should be hard.
But at the same time, it was a hypocritical measure by Obama because he only passed it in 2016 and didn't apply to his 8 years as president, and then only released a single report. A report in which he claimed only 1 civilian died in 2016 and 64 total in all 8 years of his presidency.
What's worse, no transparency at all, or just having the administration lie to you with fake numbers?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Mar 6 2019 07:05pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Mar 6 2019 07:06pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 7 Mar 2019 01:59)
That is a misrepresentation. One executive order cancelled out another. Obama's order required that civilian deaths had to be reported, even if nobody asked. The other said, "That's bullshit." The first said that every airstrike had to find out exactly how many civilians were harmed, even if it was zero, the resources had to be expended to find out that number for sure. Then it had to be publicly recorded. That is a huge waste of resources. So while it may seem great for transparency, Trump's "that's bullshit" undoing of it is just fine, in my book. I don't care. If a couple people die in foreign nations so that a jihadist cell is eliminated, whatever. I can FOIA that shit later to determine if they committed crimes against humanity or not.


Don't be offended if some day they end up in glassing your town, there's a lot of innocent civilians dying down there too, with the history we learnt how good are the "surgical strikes"...
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Mar 6 2019 07:09pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Mar 6 2019 06:06pm)
Don't be offended if some day they end up in glassing your town, there's a lot of innocent civilians dying down there too, with the history we learnt how good are the "surgical strikes"...


A german talking about nuking an American city? Isn't that hate speech, where you come from?

Without editing my former response, I retract my statement. I need to not drunken troll.

That being said, as a British talking about an American city being nuked, isn't that hate speech, where you come from?

I'm still confused dude. Enlighten me.

BTW, nazi pugs are funny as fuck.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 6 2019 07:12pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Mar 6 2019 07:14pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 7 Mar 2019 02:09)
A german talking about nuking an American city? Isn't that hate speech, where you come from?


Let me quote you again, seems you are in denial:

Quote (InsaneBobb @ 7 Mar 2019 01:59)
undoing of it is just fine, in my book. I don't care. If a couple people die in foreign nations so that a jihadist cell is eliminated, whatever. I can FOIA that shit later to determine if they committed crimes against humanity or not.


I understand better why your country killed 1 million people including hundred thousand children in Iraq war 2.
People like you are savages and honestly i don't care if ... etc... OK ?

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Mar 6 2019 07:15pm
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Mar 6 2019 07:40pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Mar 6 2019 06:14pm)
Let me quote you again, seems you are in denial:



I understand better why your country killed 1 million people including hundred thousand children in Iraq war 2.
People like you are savages and honestly i don't care if ... etc... OK ?


First, just to face the facts, we've killed just over a half million in Iraq. Keep your exaggerations to yourself, heathen.

Second, I never claimed not to be a savage. In fact, I rather prefer to be so. I don't like weakness, I think weakness should be expunged, and the fact that you are so weak leads me to believe that any opinion you have favors weakness. So I think your opinion should be expunged. Is that fair, do you think?

Once again, this topic is about undoing an executive order that REQUIRED massive manhours be spent for every single airstrike (drone or jet) to determine how many, IF ANY, civilians were killed. Why? It was a strike against enemy combatants and that is that. If civilians are killed in the process, oh well. Pull up your big girl panties, that is the cost of war. Full fucking stop. Forget your progressive talking points. While you talk about how the US should make Russia it's enemy, you side with the victims of war. What is wrong with you?

Edit: I confused which topic I was in. I have not edited any pre-posted content. I just want to make it clear I am very aware that I misstated which topic I thought I was in. I AM drunk, and that IS very much something to be used against me.

Second Edit: Nope, I'm so drunk I thought I was in the wrong. Carry on. :D

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 6 2019 07:44pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Mar 6 2019 07:47pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Mar 6 2019 06:40pm)
First, just to face the facts, we've killed just over a half million in Iraq. Keep your exaggerations to yourself, heathen.

Second, I never claimed not to be a savage. In fact, I rather prefer to be so. I don't like weakness, I think weakness should be expunged, and the fact that you are so weak leads me to believe that any opinion you have favors weakness. So I think your opinion should be expunged. Is that fair, do you think?


Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Mar 6 2019 07:51pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Mar 6 2019 06:47pm)


Come now. A person from another nation comes to me, and talks about nuking an American city, and then blames me for a half million dead in Iraq...

I'm sorry sir, if you'd responded in any other fashion, and you are an American? You're a disgrace. Go fuck yourself.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Mar 6 2019 07:51pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Mar 6 2019 07:53pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 7 Mar 2019 02:40)
First, just to face the facts, we've killed just over a half million in Iraq. Keep your exaggerations to yourself, heathen.

Second, I never claimed not to be a savage. In fact, I rather prefer to be so. I don't like weakness, I think weakness should be expunged, and the fact that you are so weak leads me to believe that any opinion you have favors weakness. So I think your opinion should be expunged. Is that fair, do you think?

Once again, this topic is about undoing an executive order that REQUIRED massive manhours be spent for every single airstrike (drone or jet) to determine how many, IF ANY, civilians were killed. Why? It was a strike against enemy combatants and that is that. If civilians are killed in the process, oh well. Pull up your big girl panties, that is the cost of war. Full fucking stop. Forget your progressive talking points. While you talk about how the US should make Russia it's enemy, you side with the victims of war. What is wrong with you?

Edit: I confused which topic I was in. I have not edited any pre-posted content. I just want to make it clear I am very aware that I misstated which topic I thought I was in. I AM drunk, and that IS very much something to be used against me.

Second Edit: Nope, I'm so drunk I thought I was in the wrong. Carry on. :D



Yeah thanks for confirming your stupidity.

Btw you are wrong, iraq war 2 was about 730k to 1.4M this is why im writing 1 million. Probably because you are not counting the civilians who starved to death because your great army destroyed all bridges, factories, water plants ...

Please drink more. Water ofc.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Mar 6 2019 07:54pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Mar 6 2019 07:54pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Mar 6 2019 06:51pm)
Come now. A person from another nations comes to me, and talks about nuking an American city, and then blames me for a half million dead in Iraq...

I'm sorry sir, if you'd responded in any other fashion, and you are an American? You're a disgrace. Go fuck yourself.


The good news is that your centrism comes out even better while you're drinking
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1281928202821282228233169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll