d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1281028112812281328143169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 1 2019 06:39pm
Quote (Brian_D @ 1 Mar 2019 22:15)
Do you ever criticize the right about anything or are you just a hack? Btw, come real close. Psstt. I didnt like Hillary or Obama.


Feel free to put the same amount of effort into left-wing hackery as Goom is putting into his.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 1 2019 08:05pm
barnie getting colonoscopy'd again

Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 1 2019 08:11pm
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/03/01/editors-note-related-lincoln-memorial-incident/

Quote
Editor’s note related to Lincoln Memorial incident
By Washington Post Staff March 1 at 5:17 PM

A Washington Post article first posted online on Jan. 19 reported on a Jan. 18 incident at the Lincoln Memorial. Subsequent reporting, a student’s statement and additional video allow for a more complete assessment of what occurred, either contradicting or failing to confirm accounts provided in that story — including that Native American activist Nathan Phillips was prevented by one student from moving on, that his group had been taunted by the students in the lead-up to the encounter, and that the students were trying to instigate a conflict. The high school student facing Phillips issued a statement contradicting his account; the bishop in Covington, Ky., apologized for the statement condemning the students; and an investigation conducted for the Diocese of Covington and Covington Catholic High School found the students’ accounts consistent with videos. Subsequent Post coverage, including video, reported these developments: “Viral standoff between a tribal elder and a high schooler is more complicated than it first seemed”; “Kentucky bishop apologizes to Covington Catholic students, says he expects their exoneration”; “Investigation finds no evidence of ‘racist or offensive statements’ in Mall incident.”

A Jan. 22 correction to the original story reads: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips said he served in the U.S. Marines but was never deployed to Vietnam.


Quote
“Too little, too late,” L. Lin Wood, an attorney representing student Nicholas Sandmann, said in a terse reply.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 1 2019 09:02pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 1 Mar 2019 22:11)

months later issue a cowardly sissie note after the embers have turned to ash

glad it backfired on the #fakenews merchants and fetishists
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Mar 1 2019 11:05pm
Quote (excellence @ Mar 1 2019 08:02pm)
months later issue a cowardly sissie note after the embers have turned to ash

glad it backfired on the #fakenews merchants and fetishists


change it
Member
Posts: 18,212
Joined: Jul 15 2014
Gold: 107.77
Mar 1 2019 11:43pm
Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 2 2019 12:47am


in a leaked phone recording, Adam Kovacevich, Google’s head of U.S. public policy, explains to Google employees why the company was a sponsor for CPAC in 2018:
Quote
The Republican Party and I think conservatism in general is also going through a lot of internal debates about what — what it should be, right, what it should be—the sort of position of the party. And I think that’s one that we should be involved in because we, I think, probably want to steer conservatives and Republicans more towards a message of liberty and freedom and away from the more nationalistic incendiary nativist comments and things like that.
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Mar 2 2019 12:56am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 1 2019 10:47pm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_HAeGe03DE

in a leaked phone recording, Adam Kovacevich, Google’s head of U.S. public policy, explains to Google employees why the company was a sponsor for CPAC in 2018:


But don't all donors to any political party or group, whether it be individuals or organizations, have inherent desires/visualizations for that party/group's future?

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Mar 2 2019 12:57am
Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 2 2019 01:09am
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 2 2019 12:56am)
But don't all donors to any political party or group, whether it be individuals or organizations, have inherent desires/visualizations for that party/group's future?


When sponsoring ideologically aligned groups and candidates its one thing. When you're infiltrating and manipulating a group you disagree with in hopes of swaying their internal opinions its another thing.
And it certainly stakes out Google's ideology as being hostile to populist conservatism.
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Mar 2 2019 01:21am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 1 2019 11:09pm)
When sponsoring ideologically aligned groups and candidates its one thing. When you're infiltrating and manipulating a group you disagree with in hopes of swaying their internal opinions its another thing.
And it certainly stakes out Google's ideology as being hostile to populist conservatism.


I guess I personally would find it more reprehensible if they were "infiltrating" for the sake of swaying the group to be more pro-Google in terms of laws and finances. It seems like they're doing what most everyone does who makes a contribution or gets involved with a party/group, and that's trying to see your vision for the party/group come to fruition.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1281028112812281328143169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll