d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1280728082809281028113169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 28 2019 04:07pm
Quote (Skinned @ Feb 28 2019 11:55pm)
Amen.

These guys would have Invaded Normandy and joined the Germans.

Good thing our Grandpas didn't.

NAP guys want to sell them supplies and call it nonpartisan.


werent no leftist anal cavity invasion pioneers at normandy
Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 28 2019 05:02pm
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/omar-israel-hawks-allegiance-foreign-country-anti-semitism.html

Ilhan Omar doubles down on the dual loyalty tropes that she just got done giving her supposed mea culpa for;

Quote
"What I am fearful of, because both Rashida and I are Muslim, is that a lot of our Jewish colleagues and constituents go to thinking that everything we say about Israel is anti-Semitic because we are Muslim," Omar said. "It's something designed to end the debate."

"It's almost as if every time we say something that is supposed to be about foreign policy, or advocacy about ending oppression, or the freeing of every human life, we get to be labeled and that ends the discussion," she said. "We end up defending that and nobody gets to have the broader debate about what is happening with Palestine."

"I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country," Omar said. "I want to ask why it is okay for me to talk about the influence of the NRA, or fossil fuel industries, or big pharma, but not talk about the influence of a powerful lobbying group that is influencing policy."
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 28 2019 05:08pm
Quote
or advocacy about ending oppression, or the freeing of every human life


... says the proponent of the religion of Sharia law and of the very culture which gave us 21st century beheadings, the real rape culture, public flogging, treating women as second class citizens, sentencing rape victims to death for "adultery", conducting suicide attacks against infidels and issuing death threats to every critic of its prophet.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 28 2019 05:09pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Feb 28 2019 06:08pm
Quote
Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, a senior and influential Republican, implored President Donald Trump on Thursday to find other pots of money available to him to build a border wall with Mexico and avoid going forward with his declaration of a national emergency.
Alexander said doing so would mean there would not be a "dangerous precedent" of a president using the emergency declaration to go directly over the will of Congress, which in this case voted to deny him those border wall funds.
It would also avoid a possible constitutional clash between the legislative and executive branches, as Congress weighs a resolution of disapproval to kill the emergency declaration with a key vote in the Senate expected sometime in the next two weeks after it passed the House Tuesday.
Alexander, who has not announced how he will vote on that resolution, raised his concerns the same day another Republican senator, Rand Paul of Kentucky, signaled he may vote against Trump on the issue.

"What I would like him to do is take another look at his existing authority and if he has sufficient funds to build 234 miles of wall, to use that," Alexander told reporters after delivering a floor speech on the issue. "From his point of view, it should avoid litigation, make sure the wall gets built, and avoid this dangerous precedent that I believe is unnecessary."
Alexander added that, "Many Republican senators share that view."
So far, three GOP senators have said they will join with the 47 Democrats to vote in favor of a resolution of disapproval of the national emergency, meaning if one more Republican -- from a long list of undecideds -- signs on, it will pass the Senate after passing the House earlier this week.
While Trump would veto it, and an override effort would likely fail because two-thirds super majority of each chamber would have to vote to against the President, the initial vote would be a rebuke of Trump and a message that even Republicans think he is overstepping his constitutional bounds.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, said senators aren't looking forward to the vote.
"People are caught between the need for border security and agreeing with (what) the President's trying to do, but not how he wants to do it," Grassley said.
Alexander, a member of the influential Appropriations Committee and who is retiring at the end of this term, said his proposal, which would draw on existing funds at the Treasury Department and Pentagon, would allow "Republican senators who want to support him on border security to be able to do that and also to keep our oath to the Constitution involving separation of powers."
He said the country is in uncharted territory with Trump's declaration.

"We've never had a case where a president has asked for money, been refused the money by Congress, then use the national emergency powers to spend it anyway," Alexander said. "To me that's a dangerous precedent."
After being swarmed by reporters after his floor speech, Alexander would not reveal whether he would be the 51st vote for the resolution of disapproval.
"I will announce how I'm going to vote when I know what we're going to be voting on," Alexander said, adding, "I learned a long time ago not to announce how will I will vote on something when I don't know what the vote will be."
Paul said he is concerned about constitutional overreach by the executive branch and appeared poised to vote against Trump's emergency declaration.

"I think it's a bad idea to run government by emergency and the power of the purse should remain with Congress," he said, stopping short of announcing how he will vote.
Alexander said he delivered copies of his floor remarks to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a close ally, and the White House counsel's office before his speech.


After Trump's failure in Vietnam he still has to deal with his failures here at home
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Mar 1 2019 12:07am
Member
Posts: 54,060
Joined: Jun 1 2010
Gold: 1.74
Mar 1 2019 12:26am
I used to watch the Jon Stewart show back when I actually watched TV.
I used to watch Steven Cobair as well. But I stopped having respect for him during the 2016 election.
Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 1 2019 12:37am
Quote (ChrisKz @ Mar 1 2019 12:26am)
I used to watch the Jon Stewart show back when I actually watched TV.
I used to watch Steven Cobair as well. But I stopped having respect for him during the 2016 election.


Stewart was always more principled and seemed genuinely interested in engaging on the issues he was crusading for. His intellectualism might have legitimately had the shortcomings his critics hurled at him like trying to have it both ways and be a news journalist when it meant cutting into partisan politics but then being an unaccountable comedian when challenged on journalistic responsibilities- but even so, he was trying. He didn't shy away from pointing out the bullshit of both sides and was willing to defend his convictions. Was Colbert ever like any of that? He sure wasn't as vitriolic and blatantly cheerleading the hate squad when he was playing conservative blackface, but that wouldn't mesh with his character anyway. But you would never see Colbert actually debate issues or go head to head in serious conversations with opposing voices, and his mockery was just as shallow then as it was now. He just had a fun character, it was legitimately funny. Compare to the straight man screaming 'orange man bad' that he is now, where the only humor comes from the parodies of him.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Mar 1 2019 06:10am
Quote (duffman316 @ Feb 28 2019 11:07pm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32NnRj_j0qs


He's principled and has been a long time. It used to always be a big part of his appeal but these days he would probably get lumped in with names he doesn't belong next to just from objectivity in his content. He wasnt into that lightweight fair and balanced bullshit he was more into actual right and wrong. He knew when to get out but he is missed
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Mar 1 2019 06:12am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Feb 28 2019 05:07pm)
werent no leftist anal cavity invasion pioneers at normandy


Just a bunch of cryptofascists like you?

Lol.

I would have gone.
Member
Posts: 54,768
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Mar 1 2019 06:15am
Quote (inkanddagger @ Feb 27 2019 03:12pm)
It's OK to hate. It's also OK to punch fascists. It's also OK to use crowbars on them.


It's OK to hate. It's also OK to punch communists. It's also OK to throw them out of helicopters.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1280728082809281028113169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll