when can we expect facebook host to remove them ?

Facebook allowed South Sudan family to auction off 16-year-old girl as child bride

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/417608-facebook-allowed-south-sudan-family-to-auction-off-16-year-old-girl-as

This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Nov 20 2018 08:56pm

In less developed countries theres little to no moderation on facebook, largely due to the language barrier

Identity politics is the politics of self-hate.

Oppression by the "we" is unforgivable, oppression by the "other" is either an expression of culture or a symptom of "we" oppression.

thats a permanent ban btw, meanwhile ... this tweet is still up just fine

https://twitter.com/ilhanmn/status/269488770066313216

the more the hijab-chick becomes a dominant face of the democratic party, the better. go ahead girl, keep reciting Allah and anti-israel hostilities, show the entire nation what happens when hijab-chicks are elected into positions of power, show us to which place the Democratic Party's obsession with "diversity" and "multiculturalism" would eventually lead us.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 21 2018 07:05pm

noobs got schooled hard by Allah i see

i'm wondering if the UN high commissioner for human rights condemning the same israeli offensive into illegally occupied land (killing more than 100 civilians, violating international law) is also an 'anti-israel hostility' according to you.

i know you generally don't really care about war crimes committed against brown people, especially muslims, but your dismissive and arrogant generalisations suggest that a woman (who calls her imaginary friend by a different name than you) doing it makes you particularly angry...

the UN bodies have, for many years, been corrupted by arabic states who pushed and lobbied for them to take on decidedly anti-israel and pro-palestinian stances. when it comes to the middle east conflict, the UN is NOT a neutral party.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 21 2018 09:54pm

yes, of course. the UN human rights commissioner probably made this whole operation up and smeared the poor innocent israelis because he is a pro-palestinian pawn controlled by 'arabic states'. actually, the whole world (except from the enlightened american and israeli extreme right) is 'corrupted' for acknowledging israeli war crimes.
in reality, israel is of course NOT violating international law, there was NO military offensive killing hundreds, there is NO illegal occupation going on. israel is NOT targeting civilians, it's all arabic propaganda, and whoever denies that or dares to criticise israel is an anti-semite, 'corrupted by arabic states'. did i get that right?

just wondering, how do you square that with the fact that the UN human rights high commissioner also criticised hamas for targeting civilians? i bet THAT part is completely fine and believable to you, just calling out israel for their crimes is obviously propaganda.

seriously, those moronic conspiracy theories are almost infowars material. it's absolutely fascinating how nonchalantly the same people, that always claim to hold 'western' (christian) values so highly, outright dismiss or rationalise gross human rights violations as long as the victims belong to a group they don't like...

This post was edited by fender on Nov 21 2018 11:07pm