Quote (fender @ 20 Feb 2019 23:15)
again, where do you see me making the point that trump is "discriminating" against them? you are the one who's lacking the nuance here, you're the one who's strawmanning hard in order to avoid the FACTS. again, trump's actions and policies regarding the lgbt community is to strip many of their previously granted PROTECTIONS (you can be a hack and re-frame them as 'privileges' and 'special treatments' to imply they were unreasonable measures to elevate them over people not belonging to that community and rationalise trump's approach, but that doesn't change the facts about his policies).
so again, no one is suggesting that trump is as bad as iran or saudi-arabia when it comes to lgbt rights, not even close - no one is suggesting he's actively discriminating against them (apart from the military ban) - but he's also not particularly progressive on the issue as proven by the FACT that he did away with protections against discrimination and efforts to research / understand / and include those communities better.
so please, go around bragging how he's better than muslim fundamentalists, but please spare me the 'fighter for lgbt rights' narrative...
you: "Trump is rolling back protections against discrimination"
also you: "where do you see me making the point that trump is 'discriminating' against them?"
btw: I never claimed that Trump was a fighter for lgbt rights, if you go back a page or two, you can actually see me calling out the hypocrisy of
this administration using this angle of attack.
----
in general, I think the key disagreement in discussions about LGBT issues is how the demands of the activists are perceived: calls for things like gay marriage, transgender bathrooms, admission of troubled personalities to the armed forces, gender-neutral language and so on - are they calls for an end of discrimination, or are they calls for special treatment?
the political right thinks these calls are the latter, while the political left thinks they're the former. this is also the fundamental point where we disagree. from my point of view, the key nuance is not the difference between "active discrimination" and "passive enabling of discrimination by removing protections", it's that I consider these things as unjustified special treatment instead of protections against discrimination.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 20 2019 04:38pm