Quote (fender @ 3 Feb 2019 15:02)
not directly, but you clearly suggested it, replying to my post about nissan's sunderland decision with a general observation that has NOTHING to do with it.
again, the fact that you not stated it explicitly does not mean it wasn't blatantly obvious what you were trying to do there...
you know what, let's dissect your moronic picture:
first, you post:
Quote (fender @ 3 Feb 2019 02:24)
then, Knoppie argues that
Quote (Knoppie)
But when 40% of the factory's production is meant for export to the EU, facing a possible 10% tariff with a hard Brexit, then I can understand a reduction of its operation. Production within the EU would make the cars ~10% cheaper...
An argument making to much sense to be called a scapegoat.
You jump in and implicitly agree with him, arguing that
Quote (fender @ 3 Feb 2019 13:18)
making a general observation that quite obviously does NOT apply to the case you're replying to, in order to distract from and downplay the real economic consequences of brexit.
But if we look a bit further into the details, the case is far less clear than you and Knoppie claim:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/feb/03/nissan-confirms-new-x-trail-will-not-be-built-in-sunderlandQuote
Nissan said plans over other future models destined for the Sunderland plant – the next-generation Juke and Qashqai – were unaffected by the announcement.
If looming tariffs and uncertainty surrounding the Brexit were the key cause for their decision to scrap the planned X-trail production in Sunderland, then this would necessarily have to apply to the planned Juke and Qashqai models as well! If we dig further, we see that the plans to produce the X-trail in Sunderland had been relatively new:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/oct/27/nissan-to-make-new-qashqai-and-x-trail-models-in-britainQuote
Nissan’s chief executive, Carlos Ghosn, has been lobbying May’s government for guarantees after the 23 June referendum. He said on Thursday that government support and assurances had led to the decision to manufacture the Qashqai and X-Trail SUV models in Sunderland. The X-Trail is an unexpected addition.
So it seems like the decision to produce the X-trail at Sunderland vs back home in Japan had been a tight one from the get go. Moreover, the older guardian article gives the impression that the planned production of the Qashqai hinged on the government guarantees as well, and as the recent guardian article reports, these plans are still valid.
All in all, Nissan's statement that
"it had taken the decision “for business reasons” but cited the impact of Brexit, saying: “The continued uncertainty around the UK’s future relationship with the EU is not helping companies like ours to plan for the future.”must rather be read as
"the uncertainty has only led to the cancellation of the X-trail production because this decision had been on the fence all along". This is also consistent with Nissan's emphasis on the saved "upfront investment costs" with an X-trail production back home in Japan.
-------
the tldr: yes, the Brexit most certainly played
some role in the cancellation of the X-trail production in Sunderland. But it is far from certain that it is the sole, or even the main reason for this decision; the further one delves into details, the less clear the picture. Hence, my warning that ideologues would falsely put full blame for business decisions on Brexit and nothing but the Brexit is well justified even in this case, and your claim that my objection does "quite obviously not apply" is unjustified.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 3 2019 09:28am