Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 25 2015 04:29pm)
I get what it's saying, but it's just making excuses. Oh, this isn't a legitimate comparison because warlords sprang up! No shit, that's what happens if you remove police from society. You don't get a fanciful world where people hire private security. You get lawlessness and clan mentality. This extends to pretty much every other facet of "free market" ideology. markets are great, but they're not perfect. Industry is great, but without reigning in externalities the results are shitty.
You really don't. A war torn failed third world state being governed by various warlords is not representative of the merits or substance of libertarianism or anarcho-capitalism. Yet here you are trumpeting somalia as its conclusion.
At no point do ancaps or libertarians here indicate that removing current state police or the current government are the sole requirements for a productive libertarian/ancap society.
Quote
Cool. You get to make this comparison if you also don't complain when I compare Ron Paul to Hitler because they were both nationalistic which has the potential to cause a holocaust.
Labeling Ron Paul 'nationalistic' seems a bit strained and bizarre.
Ron Paul directly opposed Hitlers form of government and its implementation.
I can complain or criticize something whenever I feel like it and reserve the right to point out ridiculous comparisons.
You could also point out they both liked dogs. It would be essentially meaningless in a conversation about harm in politics.
In the case of marxism being dangerous that is an inherent trait in political leaders looking to violently enforce it on a massive scale. The devastation and poverty is not merely coincidental, but rather causal.
Quote
Dude, be honest with yourself. They're being equated. If you want to make a nuanced point about the similarities between the policies go for it, but that's not done by putting Bernie in a picture next to mass murderes and including him in "the most dangerous group".
Obviously the picture has some level of humor and shock value and they are not exactly the same.
Do you think when NWA had the original picture they were saying all of them were exactly equal and the same? Or were there differences?
But a potential president Sanders enforcing his tyrannical impoverishing agenda certainly IS extremely dangerous.
Would you like to argue otherwise?