d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1272727282729273027313169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 29 2019 04:21pm

Quote (EndlessSky @ 29 Jan 2019 18:17)
Howard Schultz wants to go after entitlements... I would seriously consider voting.

dems dont like him
Member
Posts: 50,929
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Jan 29 2019 04:21pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 29 2019 04:12pm)
it is retarded, but it is equally retarded how the climate change cultists in the liberal media tried to portray the very hot summer last year as proof for the seriousness of climate change. hell, the German press even tried to spin the heavy snowfall in the alpine region 2 weeks ago as evidence for climate change. so yes, mixing up weather and climate is stupid, but both sides do it happily when it helps their cause.


I've talked to a half dozen liberals who have tried to explain to me today how this cold snap was caused by climate change, to my repeated face palms.
My go-to line for shutting down people who don't understand climate change but insist on having strong opinions on it is to simply ask them if they understand the difference between adaptation and mitigation and how the government tackles each, without googling it. If they can't pass that minimum bar, they can go sit in a corner or something. I think I might get the right answer one out of ten times. Most of them have no clue what the USACE is to begin with.
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Jan 29 2019 04:40pm
Looks like Trump will have a chance in 2020 due to Howard Schultz. Wtf does this guy think he can do? There is no way he can win so why fuck the country? What a piece of shit. btw, climate change is real, deal with it knuckle draggers.

This post was edited by Brian_D on Jan 29 2019 04:41pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 29 2019 04:43pm
Quote (Brian_D @ 29 Jan 2019 18:40)
Looks like Trump will have a chance in 2020 due to Howard Schultz. Wtf does this guy think he can do? There is no way he can win so why fuck the country? What a piece of shit.

wait didnt you want more viable 3rd party options (outside of the sjw stuff Schultz is a self-made business person who is center-left but not beholden to the (D) machine that dicked over Barnie in 2016) or you just in the tank for the lefties cuz they subsidize your hgh cycles

guess youre just getting old and more irrelevant and cant remember your own thoughts

reported, btw
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 29 2019 04:50pm
Quote (fender @ 29 Jan 2019 18:04)
that has to be the 10th time he illustrated that he can't distinguish climate from weather. have his handlers just not told him yet, or is this retarded talking point seriously considered a valid 'argument' by the cult? absolutely insane...


Quote (fender @ 23 Nov 2016 16:55)
otamendi... looks like de bruyne's pathetic card waving in the 1st half payed off already... what a bunch of faggots...
Quote (fender @ 4 Feb 2017 16:15)
call me heinrich, nazi, bigot, homophobe, anti-turk
Quote (fender @ 18 Feb 2018 10:59)
as a matter of fact, these days WE are being invaded by polaks searching for mostly unskilled manual labour here.


Quote (fender @ 25 Oct 2017 11:21)
"edgy" white trash teenager
Quote (fender @ 4 Oct 2017 19:10)
brown ppl are just lazy and want everything done for them
Quote (fender @ 25 May 2017 19:26)
brainwashed monkeys, haha...


:unsure:
e: reported, btw

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 29 2019 04:52pm
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 29 2019 04:55pm
Quote (Brian_D @ 29 Jan 2019 23:40)
. btw, climate change is real, deal with it knuckle draggers.


of course it is real, but the extent that has to be expected is still not entirely clear; and what to do about it is something that isnt being discussed yet.

just to name an example, here in Germany, our braindead government has worked out a plan to shut down all our national coal power plants over the next 17 years - but they dont have a plan yet on how to replace those capacities which will be removed. in the end, we will probably import power produced in much less "clean" coal power plants in eastern europe, or nuclear energy produced in highly insecure power plants next to our border.

and of course our 20 or so coal power plants will be a drop in the ocean compared to the over 1400 coal power plants currently planned in china and india.

meanwhile, the green party and their heralds in our media shill for even more subsidies for solar power. so they want to shut down relatively modern coal power stations here and replace them with solar power in cloudy, rainy Germany, while tons of new and less clean/modern coal stations will go on stream in sunny india over the same timeframe.

it's really the total idiocy and incompetence. it's a textbook example of politics for the "feelz".
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 29 2019 04:59pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 29 Jan 2019 23:12)
it is retarded, but it is equally retarded how the climate change cultists in the liberal media tried to portray the very hot summer last year as proof for the seriousness of climate change. hell, the German press even tried to spin the heavy snowfall in the alpine region 2 weeks ago as evidence for climate change. so yes, mixing up weather and climate is stupid, but both sides do it happily when it helps their cause.


nice whataboutism / false equivalence combo, but some extreme weather events (including COLD spells) and particularly their (well documented) increasing occurence ARE indeed linked to manmade climate change.
i'm not an expert on alpine snowfall patterns, but heavy snows in the winter don't seem unusual to me at first glance - so they would have to document an unusual cumulation or severity to even talk about it in a context of climate change. then again, i haven't seen any of those articles, meaning i'll refrain from judging 'the german press' solely based on a claim you made - so please link me some of the articles where 'THE GERMAN PRESS' falsely links it to climate change. also, i'd be interested to learn what you think the "cause" is that they're trying to "help" by reporting falsely about it.
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 29 2019 05:01pm
Quote (Brian_D @ Jan 29 2019 05:40pm)
Looks like Trump will have a chance in 2020 due to Howard Schultz. Wtf does this guy think he can do? There is no way he can win so why fuck the country? What a piece of shit. btw, climate change is real, deal with it knuckle draggers.


He wouldn't have run if the Democrats weren't so extreme. Their party needs to be destroyed and rebuilt because right now its Soros' bitch.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 29 2019 05:09pm
Quote (fender @ 29 Jan 2019 18:59)
nice whataboutism / false equivalence combo, but some extreme weather events (including COLD spells) and particularly their (well documented) increasing occurence ARE indeed linked to manmade climate change.
i'm not an expert on alpine snowfall patterns, but heavy snows in the winter don't seem unusual to me at first glance - so they would have to document an unusual cumulation or severity to even talk about it in a context of climate change. then again, i haven't seen any of those articles, meaning i'll refrain from judging 'the german press' solely based on a claim you made - so please link me some of the articles where 'THE GERMAN PRESS' falsely links it to climate change. also, i'd be interested to learn what you think the "cause" is that they're trying to "help" by reporting falsely about it.

find them yourself, limpy
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 29 2019 05:12pm
and the golden fedora goes to...

Quote (Goomshill @ 29 Jan 2019 23:21)
I've talked to a half dozen liberals who have tried to explain to me today how this cold snap was caused by climate change, to my repeated face palms.
My go-to line for shutting down people who don't understand climate change but insist on having strong opinions on it is to simply ask them if they understand the difference between adaptation and mitigation and how the government tackles each, without googling it. If they can't pass that minimum bar, they can go sit in a corner or something. I think I might get the right answer one out of ten times. Most of them have no clue what the USACE is to begin with.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1272727282729273027313169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll