Quote (ofthevoid @ 7 Mar 2020 04:38)

>tax cuts were only for the rich

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-how-much-american-workers-saved-during-the-first-year-after-trumps-tax-reform-2020-03-03

Quote

“The parts of the Trump tax cuts that really benefit the rich are not the personal-income-tax cuts but the corporate-income-tax cuts and estate-tax cuts,” according to Wamhoff. Rule changes surrounding corporate taxes, “which mainly benefit the (mostly rich) people who own corporate stocks, and the estate-tax cuts, are the parts of the law that made it a good deal for the rich,” Wamhoff said.

He added: “No one ever said that low- or middle-income people would get no benefits from the Trump tax law. What ITEP and others pointed out from the beginning was that the rich would get a disproportionate share of the benefits of the law and nothing in this data conflicts with that.”

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 7 Mar 2020 03:17)

Mark Meadows was just named new chief of staff. :rofl:
Let's just say that he wont be trying to rein in the President's impulses...

Quote

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The former British intelligence officer who produced a ‘dossier’ linking Donald Trump and his presidential campaign to Russia has declined to give an interview to a prosecutor assigned by U.S. Attorney General William Barr to investigate aspects of the 2016 U.S. campaign, three sources familiar with the matter said.

The prosecution team, led by Connecticut-based federal prosecutor John Durham, recently approached representatives of Christopher Steele, the former British spy who produced the Trump dossier for a Washington-based investigations firm hired by Democratic Party lawyers.

Steele’s representatives told Durham’s team that the former officer for Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service, also known as MI6, was not interested in cooperating with Durham’s investigation and would not speak to his team, the sources said. Steele was concerned that Durham’s investigation was overly politicized and he would not be treated fairly, the sources said.

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Mar 7 2020 07:57am)

The Trump administration’s decision to forgo a World Health Organization test and create its own had fateful consequences, experts say.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/06/coronavirus-testing-failure-123166?=

I'm curious if there's any argumentation against that, dunno who are the "experts" tho.
"
The rivalries in the administration — between health agencies such as the FDA and CDC, and between individual officials — that appeared to hamper the initial response have been only partly quelled by the appointment of Pence as leader of the task force..

I guess it's the 1rst healthcare system ONLY for those who can pay or have public insurance like lawmakers or high officials.

Funny.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 6 2020 10:50pm)

You should include the other key quote from the article:

Quote (ofthevoid @ 7 Mar 2020 15:50)

The no one ever said part is false. I repeatedly heard it on many msm outlets and on here.

Are we really going to pretend that the tax cuts were not repeatedly labeled to benefit the rich and/or corporations consistently?