you can't verify something you can see on a satellite image in real time, but you know how many people died? interesting.

the BBC and the Biden Whitehouse both did independent investigations. the outcome of those is that the hospital wasn't hit at all, that the crater it left was far too small to be an israeli bomb, that there's a video from the exact moment it hit where you can see hamas firing rockets as well as a rocket which veers off towards the hospiral, and you can see an explosion on the video at the hospital, and that 500 people wouldnt have even fit in the blast radius of that hamas rocket shoulder to shoulder. so its unlikely that the parking lot that hamas accidentally shot a rocket at even had 100 people in it. oh, and for a kicker, cell phone recordings of hamas were intercepted where a soldier tells a hamas commander he had a rocket misfire and head towards the hospital.

u got fool, its ok, it happens to us all, the fog of war here is thick.

If 60 people die in a strike but you lie and say 500 died it begs the question why would you trust that type of source subsequently. Problem with just lying about the number is they potentially lied about the source of the bombing (at this point it being openly debated that it actually came from a faulty Hamas rocket).

So what happened next is embassies were burned, people assaulted, property destroyed, all based on a potential lie. That's not minutiae, it matters if Israel full knowingly dropped massive bomb on a hospital or it dropped a smaller one in a parking lot or that it was fired by Hamas.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Oct 19 2023 02:12pm

It's time to stop giving people the benefit of the doubt when they parrot Hamas propaganda

there is NO doubt of their intentions

last week: "they said 40 babies were beheaded to stoke violence, its not true, so we must focus on it because the exact number is crucial" gnarjay

now: "so maybe it was 100 not 500. and maybe it wasnt even israel. but it doesnt matter....for.....reasons" gnarjay

for reference this is the blast site were hamas claims 472 people died and hundreds more were injured. only theoretically possible if they were all packed in like sardines on the exact spot it hit.

for anyone still in doubt about YOUR intentions:



and not a single of your fellow apartheid enthusiasts has denounced it, has pointed out what a disgusting and racist attitude that is...

i can't even imagine the (justified) outrage if someone posted something like that about israel... but when it's "just" brown people, "just" muslims, every one of them treats it like it's not a big deal that you're openly in support of genocide...

I literally gave you a range, lmfao. some sources are saying 500, most are saying 100-300 so I went with that. whats the issue??

the non-israeli investigations with video, photo, and cell phone evidence that show it almost certainly wasn't israel. far more evidence than we have on the exact number of beheaded babies u cared so much for.

No it didn't literally happen, 1400 people were killed, not 9340000. It was an attack by a militant group most likely seeking an extreme response to drive up recruitment and galvanize the Arab world against Israel. More people have been killed than that in Gaza already, men, women and children. Is this not indicative of genocidal intent on Israel's part if it does for Hamas? Or does it not work that way?



See above.

I'm not sure what would happen if Israel was ever conquered but I doubt it would be the systematic killing of jews. I wouldnt be surprised if many were forced to leave though, which wouldn't be pretty by any means. I'm not sure how concerned the Arabs would be with the demographics if they were in control, but forced deportations would be much easier, even the Germans couldn't get them all and they had a whole assembly (disassembly?) line set up to get the job done, you think a bunch of masked up goons with an IQ of 70 and some AKs are going to top them?

Amir Weitmann from Likud makes an appearance on Russia Today