Quote (Ryvulet @ Sep 16 2024 09:32pm)
It was just in response to some non-sensical statement from some1 who was trying to pivot data in a video to his perspective advantage when he didn't even understand what he was saying.
You keep trying to attach intent to my posts as if I was trying to paint some sort of narrative. Not only you're wrong, it just shows how weak your position is.
As an observer is bewildering your choices year after year end up being this horrible. But is not me who gets defensive when I try to get you to defend your candidate of choice's policies.
Quote (Ryvulet @ Sep 15 2024 01:22am)
Right at the start of the video it says that Trumps' tariff tax could pay for most of his cuts. I feel like if you were asking this question in good faith perhaps you forgot that?
I questioned whether the conjecture of Trump's tariff paying for the cuts was solid. Making reference to the obvious repercussion; consumers who depended on those low value items will be shit out of luck and have to look for more expensive alternatives. Furthermore if people stop purchasing those highly taxed products, where is the money to upset the cuts coming from?
But if you were responding in good faith, you'd respond without getting your feathers shuffled. I understand emperor trump can't be criticized, but tough luck cause I don't care about your feelings.
Quote (Ryvulet @ Sep 15 2024 02:37pm)
Do you care more about a foreign product being marketed here; or do u care more about the potential quality of life and balanced economy that can be achieved through that potential short term sacrifice?
'potential short term sacrifice' with the potential of leaving long term repercussions.
---
Thank you
your post was worth reading
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.